×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 1543
Wednesday, 17 January 2007 07:52

NASA goes metric for Moon missions

By
Every country in the world has adopted the metric system for its units of measurements except for Liberia, Myanmar (formerly Burma), and the United States. The people of the United States tried to convert to metric—mostly in the 1960s and 1970s (remember metrification?)—but it failed miserably. However, to avoid confusion, minimize safety concerns, and support international cooperation, NASA has decided to use the metric units for all operations with respect to its new lunar initiatives.

The International System of Units (SI: based on the French term Système International d'Unités) is the internationally recognized metric system. Its base units of measure are: meter (m) for length, kilogram (kg) for mass, second (s) for time, ampere (A) for electrical current, kelvin (K) for thermodynamic temperature, mole (mol) for amount of substance, and candela (cd) for luminous intensity. On the other hand, the system of measurement used in the United States is called the U.S. customary units or English units or standard units. Miles, feet, yards, and inches are all terms used to denote length in the U.S. system.

In actuality, NASA, itself, has primarily used the metric system since 1990. However, many U.S. aerospace companies still use English units when building hardware or developing software. Because of this situation, NASA has experienced problems in the past. For example, it lost its Mars Climate Orbiter in 1999 when a government contractor provided NASA with thruster data in English units (pounds-force) instead of metric units (newtons) that was used by the spacecraft. Shortly after the disaster, Edward Weiler, NASA’s Associate Administrator for Space Science said, “The problem here was not the error, it was the failure of NASA's systems engineering, and the checks and balances in our processes to detect the error. That’s why we lost the spacecraft.” Thus, a benefit for going totally metric is to minimize such costly and embarrassing moments.

The Vision for Space Exploration is the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) plan to return astronauts to the Moon by the year 2020 and to eventually set up a lunar base on the Moon’s surface. Beginning in April 2006, a series of meetings between representatives of NASA and thirteen other space agencies around the world decided that it would standardize its use of measurements—going completely with the metric system.

The fourteen countries or regions in the world with space programs that participated in these meetings and have interest in exploring the Moon are: Australia, Canada, China, European Space Agency, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

Jeff Volosin, strategy development representative for NASA’s Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, stated recently about the decision to convert to the metric system and the interaction between NASA and the other space agencies: “Of course there’s some competitiveness and national pride involved, but we want to find areas where our goals overlap and see if cooperating in certain areas would be best for everyone.”

With the Moon being converted to the metric system, the same situation, unfortunately, still exists on the Earth. The United States, Myanmar, and Liberia still do not use the metric system while every other country does. SI units are still usually denoted alongside English units in the United States and SI units are only sometimes taught in the grade schools. The military, medical, and scientific sectors within the United States are the only ones that regularly use SI units. U.S. companies that have a large international presence are more likely to use the metric system in order to meet international standards and certifications.

Maybe with NASA’s conversion to metric, the United States will be spurred to do likewise.

To learn more about the SI metric system, go to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Web site: https://www.physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/.

 


Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here

GRAND OPENING OF THE ITWIRE SHOP

The much awaited iTWire Shop is now open to our readers.

Visit the iTWire Shop, a leading destination for stylish accessories, gear & gadgets, lifestyle products and everyday portable office essentials, drones, zoom lenses for smartphones, software and online training.

PLUS Big Brands include: Apple, Lenovo, LG, Samsung, Sennheiser and many more.

Products available for any country.

We hope you enjoy and find value in the much anticipated iTWire Shop.

ENTER THE SHOP NOW!

INTRODUCING ITWIRE TV

iTWire TV offers a unique value to the Tech Sector by providing a range of video interviews, news, views and reviews, and also provides the opportunity for vendors to promote your company and your marketing messages.

We work with you to develop the message and conduct the interview or product review in a safe and collaborative way. Unlike other Tech YouTube channels, we create a story around your message and post that on the homepage of ITWire, linking to your message.

In addition, your interview post message can be displayed in up to 7 different post displays on our the iTWire.com site to drive traffic and readers to your video content and downloads. This can be a significant Lead Generation opportunity for your business.

We also provide 3 videos in one recording/sitting if you require so that you have a series of videos to promote to your customers. Your sales team can add your emails to sales collateral and to the footer of their sales and marketing emails.

See the latest in Tech News, Views, Interviews, Reviews, Product Promos and Events. Plus funny videos from our readers and customers.

SEE WHAT'S ON ITWIRE TV NOW!

BACK TO HOME PAGE

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous

WEBINARS ONLINE & ON-DEMAND

GUEST ARTICLES

VENDOR NEWS

Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News

Comments