Security Market Segment LS
Tuesday, 15 October 2019 20:13

Censorship: ACSC anger over lawyer likening Australian law to China Featured

Censorship: ACSC anger over lawyer likening Australian law to China Image by DavidRockDesign from Pixabay

The Australian Cyber Security Centre tried to censor the content of a talk to be given by the partner of a Sydney legal firm at the CyberCon conference in Melbourne last week, but the organisers backed down at the last minute and the talk went ahead in its original format. The main objection apparently was to the lawyer's statement that Australia's encryption law was similar to laws in China.

Ted Ringrose, a partner with Ringrose Siganto, told iTWire that the organisers, the Australian Information Security Association, had told him that the ACSC had objected to his talk and termed it "biased".

The talk was titled "Ill conceived, unguided and undefined: Some ways the new Encryption Law will impact the technology industry in Australia”, and the ACSC had wanted it changed to “Some ways the new Encryption Law will impact the technology industry in Australia”. Ringrose said he was okay with this.

As iTWire has reported, two well-known speakers, Thomas Drake, formerly of the NSA, and Dr Suelette Dreyfus, a researcher from Melbourne University, had their talks cancelled due to censorship, again by the ACSC.

Ringrose said he had submitted a synopsis of his talk a few months before the conference and just before the conference brochure was to be published he got a call from AISA saying that the Australian Signals Directorate and the ACSC had objected to the title.

He sent his slides to the organisers on 26 September, but was contacted by AISA on 2 October; they conveyed the ACSC's reaction to his talk.

"I couldn’t talk that night so the AISA person said we could talk the next day but in the meantime he would send a new version of my slides," Ringrose told iTWire. "That version was sent on Thursday (3 October) and I was surprised to see that a large number of slides had been deleted, some had been altered and the title changed back to that in the brochure."

When he spoke to the AISA person, the latter told him they had dropped a couple of speakers and that the ACSC was not happy with his slides.

"To me the implication was that if I didn’t agree to changes, I’d be next. I explained that they didn’t know what I was going to say and that, in fact, the editing of the slides had made my criticism of the Encryption Law appear much worse than it was. They particularly seemed to object to my comparison of the law with a similar law (and laws) in the People’s Republic of China."

Last year, during hearings on the encryption law — officially known as the Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Act 2018 — at the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, committee chair Andrew Hastie also took offence to people who drew parallels between Australia and China when it came to laws of this nature. Another prominent Australian who has made similar comments is Mike Burgess, former head of the ASD, and now the head of ASIO.

Said Ringrose: "The upshot of the call was that I sent an email to AISA giving more information about what I was going to say and that I had bought my ticket to Melbourne, but would not be coming to give another person’s talk. I rejected the allegation of bias, explaining that I had no tech clients and that my talk was based on my 30 years experience as a lawyer in Asia, the UK and Australia, as a partner in US and UK law firms and general counsel in Asia for major US corporations.

“I consider the law to be illiberal, hopelessly uncertain and ridiculously wide in its purported application.  It will create uncertainty and harm the tech industry in Australia.”

He said later the same day he received an email from AISA saying they were making an executive decisions to let the talk proceed as he wanted it, with no changes to his slides as it was too late for ACSC to be banning speakers or changing presentations. He was grateful for AISA’s support.

This is the first year that the ACSC conference has been dovetailed into AISA's event, presumably in order to save money. It is the biggest such event in Australia and attracted some 3600 people this year.


26-27 February 2020 | Hilton Brisbane

Connecting the region’s leading data analytics professionals to drive and inspire your future strategy

Leading the data analytics division has never been easy, but now the challenge is on to remain ahead of the competition and reap the massive rewards as a strategic executive.

Do you want to leverage data governance as an enabler?Are you working at driving AI/ML implementation?

Want to stay abreast of data privacy and AI ethics requirements? Are you working hard to push predictive analytics to the limits?

With so much to keep on top of in such a rapidly changing technology space, collaboration is key to success. You don't need to struggle alone, network and share your struggles as well as your tips for success at CDAO Brisbane.

Discover how your peers have tackled the very same issues you face daily. Network with over 140 of your peers and hear from the leading professionals in your industry. Leverage this community of data and analytics enthusiasts to advance your strategy to the next level.

Download the Agenda to find out more


Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.



Recent Comments