Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

Sunday, 20 March 2011 09:38

Google GPL violation claims speculative: expert


The claim that Google may be in violation of the GNU General Public Licence is a speculative hypothesis that needs more study before it can be taken seriously, a GPL expert and free software activist says.

Bradley Kuhn said most of what had been written about the licence violation claim was "poorly drafted speculation".

A few days back, iTWire, among other media outlets, reported that an IP lawyer had claimed Google could be in violation of the GPL because the Bionic C library, the default C library in Android, imports "scrubbed" kernel headers from Linux.

Kuhn said no-one had done the "incredibly-time consuming work to figure out anything approaching a definitive answer!"

He described the expanded research note written by lawyer Edward Naughton, as "a position paper for a research project yet to be done". He did not mention Houston Law Center law professor Raymond Nimmer who had flagged the same claim on his IP Info blog.

Naughton's paper presented some interesting points that could serve as the starting point for much deeper analysis and study, Kuhn said, adding that he found it "disturbing" that it was presented as though it was a complete analysis.

While Kuhn gave credit to Naughton for, at one point, admitting that more detailed and painstaking analysis was needed to make a definitive claim, he said the lawyer also indulged in sweeping conclusions which led others to draw the wrong conclusion.

He pointed to this statement by Naughton: "The 750 Linux kernel header files '¦ define a complex overarching structure, an application programming interface, that is thoughtfully and cleverly designed, and almost assuredly protected by copyright."

Kuhn said this was "a hypothesis, that would have (to) be tested and proved with evidence generated by the careful line-by-line analysis Naughton himself admits is necessary.

"Yet, he doesn't acknowledge that fact in his conclusions, leaving his readers (and IMO he's expecting to dupe lots of readers unsophisticated on these issues) with the impression he's shown something he hasn't.

"For example, one of my first questions would be whether or not Bionic uses only parts of Linux headers that are required by specification to write POSIX programs, a question that Naughton doesn't even consider."

Kuhn said Naughton also indulged in alarmist speculation with the claim that if Google had managed to remove all copyrightable material from the kernel, it had removed all restrictions imposed by GPLv2 on the kernel.

"If it turns out that Google has succeeded in making sure that the GPLv2 does not apply to Bionic, then Google's success is substantially more narrow," Kuhn said.

"The success would be merely the extraction of the non-copyrightable facts that any C library needs to know about Linux to make a binary run when Linux happens to be the kernel underneath."

He pointed out that the same thing had been done twice before with glibc and uClibc, both under a weak LGPL licence. Google had merely provided a third alternative.

There was no expectation on anyone's part that programs that interfaced with Linux (the kernel) solely as user-space programs would come under the same licence as the kernel. And, he pointed out, comparing what Google had done to other techniques used to circumvent the GPL was "just link-baiting that borders on trolling".

While Kuhn felt that Google should have used one of the existing libraries instead of writing its own, he added that "the worst that we might be able to accuse Google of is inadvertently taking a copyright-infringing short-cut".

And if someone did all the research necessary to prove that Google had indeed taken a copyright-infringing shortcut, Kuhn said he was confident that it could all be cleared up easily.

He added" "...the implications of the whole thing wouldn't go beyond: 'It's possible to write your own C library for Linux that isn't covered by the GPLv2' '” a fact which we've all known for a decade and a half anyway."

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here


It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinatrs and campaigns and assassistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.



iTWire TV offers a unique value to the Tech Sector by providing a range of video interviews, news, views and reviews, and also provides the opportunity for vendors to promote your company and your marketing messages.

We work with you to develop the message and conduct the interview or product review in a safe and collaborative way. Unlike other Tech YouTube channels, we create a story around your message and post that on the homepage of ITWire, linking to your message.

In addition, your interview post message can be displayed in up to 7 different post displays on our the site to drive traffic and readers to your video content and downloads. This can be a significant Lead Generation opportunity for your business.

We also provide 3 videos in one recording/sitting if you require so that you have a series of videos to promote to your customers. Your sales team can add your emails to sales collateral and to the footer of their sales and marketing emails.

See the latest in Tech News, Views, Interviews, Reviews, Product Promos and Events. Plus funny videos from our readers and customers.


Sam Varghese

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous




Guest Opinion

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News