Thursday, 13 January 2011 11:19

Pushing the limits of the GPL

By

What are the limits of the GNU General Public Licence? Is it something that locks one in for all time as some claim? Or is there a way of placing the code under some other licence?


These questions came up recently after a hosting provider, Appnor, took an application that had been under the GPL and, after obtaining consent from the original developer and paying for the rights, released it with his own changes under a proprietary licence.

Appnor's Dragos Manac came in for a shellacking from the ferals who infest the American news accumulation site Slashdot after news of what had happened was posted on the site a couple of days ago.

Manac had obtained the rights to WinMTR, a port of mtr, a tool for testing networks. It combines the functions of ping and traceroute in a single diagnostic tool.

WinMTR had been developed by Vasile Stanimir, a friend of Manac's. The project was at a standstill for some years, he claims.

Manac said in a posting on his blog: "Since the project was no longer being developed, I offered to buy the rights and offer it for free, on behalf of Appnor. So I bought the rights."

His intention was to offer WinMTR as freeware under a proprietary licence. "After 3 days (actually nights) of reflecting on it, I decided to revoke the GPL since we had full rights. There was only one external contribution, a broken patch from 2001 that got removed. Nobody went through the trouble of adding new features in a decade, but there were many feature requests."

But he was not prepared for the storm that erupted once this news was posted on Slashdot, referencing a post by an open source developer, Philip Paradis. A respondent to the post on Paradis' blog pointed out some lines of code which were believed to be from the original mtr and which, could, therefore mean that Manac was violating the GPL.

"I strongly believe that we are entitled to change the license. But to what effect? An angry mob. The comments on Slashdot prove that; A good story for our competition; (and) a very long list of debates and arguments in which we have to prove that we are not creeps," Manac wrote.

He has now released the code for WinMTR under the second version of the GPL. It seems unlikely that he had any bad intentions.


A well-known free software advocate and GPL expert believes that all the inaccuracies could be explained by confusion on Manac's part, not malevolence.

Bradley Kuhn told iTWire: "It's true that one can choose to cease distribution under the GPL: that's fine.  Indeed, no one is required to continually distribute something under the terms of the GPL; they can stop whenever they want."

Kuhn added: "However, there is a very important distinction between 'not distributing anymore under the GPL' and 'revoking the license of those who already received copies under GPL'. 

"Everything I've just read about this story appear to confuse these two issues completely, including Dragos' own blog post and those responding to him. I can't even figure out which of those things he intended to do in the first place.

"In fact, we'll probably never know what Dragos intended to do here, since he's now said that he will make the code available under the GPL himself again.  It therefore seems like a non-story to me at this point."

Kuhn said that, to his knowledge, the GPL was an irrevocable license. "Once software is legitimately released under the GPL, everyone who received a copy under the GPL has rights to copy, share, modify and/or redistribute that software under the terms of the GPL.

"Meanwhile, if the copyright of the original version was held by a single person or entity, they can of course relicense *that* version another way, and stop releasing future versions of their own under the GPL."

Asked about projects which had multiple people contributing code under the GPL, Kuhn said it was possible to relicense code in this case too, provided that there was universal agreement of all copyright holders.

"If no copyright assignments are in place, the only permission anyone has to make and distribute the work is under PL. Each patch sent in by a contributor is typically a derivative work (IANAL, but that's what lawyers have told me)," Kuhn added.

Read 8918 times

Please join our community here and become a VIP.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here
JOIN our iTWireTV our YouTube Community here
BACK TO LATEST NEWS here

GET READY FOR XCONF AUSTRALIA 2022

Thoughtworks presents XConf Australia, back in-person in three cities, bringing together people who care deeply about software and its impact on the world.

In its fifth year, XConf is our annual technology event created by technologists for technologists.

Participate in a robust agenda of talks as local thought leaders and Thoughtworks technologists share first-hand experiences and exchange new ways to empower teams, deliver quality software and drive innovation for responsible tech.

Explore how at Thoughtworks, we are making tech better, together.

Tickets are now available and all proceeds will be donated to Indigitek, a not-for-profit organisation that aims to create technology employment pathways for First Nations Peoples.


Click the button below to register and get your ticket for the Melbourne, Sydney or Brisbane event

GET YOUR TICKET!

PROMOTE YOUR WEBINAR ON ITWIRE

It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site itwire.com and prominent Newsletter promotion https://itwire.com/itwire-update.html and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV https://www.youtube.com/c/iTWireTV/videos which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinars and campaigns and assistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.

MORE INFO HERE!

BACK TO HOME PAGE
Sam Varghese

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous

VENDOR NEWS