Home Open Source Debian members afraid to make or propose change, says leadership contender
Debian members afraid to make or propose change, says leadership contender Image by Hannah Edgman from Pixabay

The Debian GNU/Linux project has a lack of leadership, veteran developer Martin Michlmayr says, adding that while there are many talented people in the project, members are afraid to make or propose changes, especially big, far-reaching ones.

Michlmayr made the comments as part of his platform for the leadership elections; he and four others are contesting for leader of the project, with the campaigning period running until 6 April. Nominees also take part in online debates as part of pushing their claims to the post of leader.

He said that he had not been active in Debian of late but believed that the role of DPL should have three sides to it: administrator, facilitator and leader.

Having been the DPL in 2003 and 2004, Michlmayr said he was familiar with the role. "If I didn't believe in Debian, I wouldn't run in this DPL election. I acted as DPL before and know how difficult being the DPL can be sometimes. Yes, I see severe problems in Debian, but I firmly believe that together we can solve them!" he added.

Michlmayr pointed out that the open source world had fundamentally changed in the last five to ten years in many ways.

"Yet, if you look at Debian, we mostly operate the same way we did 20 years ago. Debian used to be a pioneer, a true leader. Package managers, automatic upgrades, and packages builds on 10+ architectures — they were all novel, true innovations at the time. The only significant innovation I can think of that came out of Debian in recent years are reproducible builds. Reproducible builds solve an important problem and the idea has spread beyond Debian to the whole FOSS world."

Another candidate, Joerg Jaspert, said the role of DPL was not to find technical solutions to problems faced by the project, but rather to enable others to solve challenges.

"The DPL should work [on] removing blockers and let developers get on with their jobs," he said. "It's also the job of the DPL to listen. And be guided by the community."

Jaspert said Debian did not only consist of packaging and similar technical activities, "we have a lot of other contributions that are equally important".

"We need to encourage more people who aren't well versed in the technical work to contribute in various non-technical ways. That can range from writing documentation, translations, help with the website, design work, help users with their problems or representing Debian at events. Or organising such events, like BTS or local 'miniconf' gatherings. All of that is as important as the packagers work."

He pledged to work with anyone who wanted to improve processes within the project "to identify non-trivial bottlenecks, to reduce our complexity and to improve communication between teams, where needed".

Jonathan Carter, a third developer who has thrown his hat in the ring, said he had broad goals in the event that he was elected.

"My intention is not to pursue big, hairy and audacious goals. Instead, I aim to improve communication to help enable our community to fix existing problems and help make ideas flourish," he said.

"I want to promote polish and help drive better quality all over Debian, whether that's in our final products or community processes."

Carter said he wanted Debian to be an attractive project in which to participate.

"Every Debian developer should be outright proud to be associated with the project. The above might come across as playing it safe, and not being very ambitious, but I think big things can be achieved with baby steps and I hope to convey that in my platform," he added.

His high-level goals were listed as: not intending to solve every problem in Debian during this term; not treating the role of DPL as purely administrative; to be an enabler; to make community processes a first-class citizen in Debian; make the DPL more approachable; promote new ideas and experimentation; foster the community; and follow the principle that small details mattered.

Keeping Debian a fun project was the main aim of a fourth candidate, Sam Hartman. He advocated listening without escalation, quick decision-making, explaining what Debian was to other organisations and the media, speaking at conferences, supporting free software, supporting any ongoing efforts and approving expenditure as and when needed.

"Debian is not fun when we face gruelling, long, heated discussions," he said. "It is not fun when we are unable to move a project forward because we cannot figure out how to get our ideas considered or how to contribute effectively.

"Debian is not fun when processes or tools are cumbersome. When key teams break down or get stuck, Debian is not fun either for the members of those teams or for those who depend on them. Debian is not fun when it isn't safe – when we are not respected, when we are harassed, or when we (rather than our ideas) are judged. I support our Code of Conduct."

Hartman said he preferred that the responsibilities of DPL were discharged by a team.

"I think a team could help me in the following areas," he said.

  • "The mediation work is big enough that we need to spread it across multiple people;
  • "The responsibility of representing Debian at conferences could be split across a team;
  • "I would like to spread some of the ongoing financial work to a team; and
  • "I'm open to using teams in other areas where the job proves to be bigger than we expect."

The fifth candidate, Simon Richter, has not yet put his platform priorities online.

Voting for the DPL take place from 7 April to 20 April.

FREE SEMINAR

Site24x7 Seminars

Deliver Better User Experience in Today's Era of Digital Transformation

Some IT problems are better solved from the cloud

Join us as we discuss how DevOps in combination with AIOps can assure a seamless user experience, and assist you in monitoring all your individual IT components—including your websites, services, network infrastructure, and private or public clouds—from a single, cloud-based dashboard.

Sydney 7th May 2019

Melbourne 09 May 2019

Don’t miss out! Register Today!

REGISTER HERE!

LEARN HOW TO REDUCE YOUR RISK OF A CYBER ATTACK

Australia is a cyber espionage hot spot.

As we automate, script and move to the cloud, more and more businesses are reliant on infrastructure that has the high potential to be exposed to risk.

It only takes one awry email to expose an accounts’ payable process, and for cyber attackers to cost a business thousands of dollars.

In the free white paper ‘6 Steps to Improve your Business Cyber Security’ you’ll learn some simple steps you should be taking to prevent devastating and malicious cyber attacks from destroying your business.

Cyber security can no longer be ignored, in this white paper you’ll learn:

· How does business security get breached?
· What can it cost to get it wrong?
· 6 actionable tips

DOWNLOAD NOW!

Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the sitecame into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

 

Popular News

 

Telecommunications

 

Guest Opinion

 

Sponsored News

 

 

 

 

Connect