Saturday, 27 August 2016 16:23

SFC's Kuhn in firing line as Linus Torvalds takes aim Featured

By

A few days after he mused that there had been no reason for him to blow his stack recently, Linux creator Linus Torvalds has directed a blast at the Software Freedom Conservancy and its distinguished technologist Bradley Kuhn over the question of enforcing compliance of the GNU General Public Licence.

Torvalds' rant came on Friday, as usual on a mailing list and on a thread which was started by Software Freedom Conservancy head Karen Sandler on Wednesday last week. She suggested that LinuxCon in Toronto, held from Monday to Thursday, also include a session on GPL enforcement.

In an interview with iTWire last week to mark the 25th birthday of the kernel, Torvalds had expressed similar views about the GPL to what he did on Friday, though his language was extremely temperate on that occasion.

Kernel developer Christoph Hellwig lost a GPL case against virtualisation company VMware in the first week of August, having alleged that the company had been using his code from the Busybox utility without providing source. Last month the SFC had highlighted the case of another developer, Patrick McHardy, alleging that he is using GPL enforcement to make money.

Thus, GPL enforcement is in the news, even though most mainstream Linux websites avoid reporting on what they consider negative aspects of life in the FOSS community. iTWire was conspicuous by its reporting of Hellwig's loss.

Early on in the discussion, which is well worth reading, a number of developers cautioned that while discussing enforcement issues was topical and necessary, doing it at a conference of this kind could well lead to people who took part being deposed later on by lawyers for their own cases.

Sandler's request was denied by senior developer Greg Kroah-Hartman, who was more inclined to the view that GPL violations could be tackled from within a company, rather than by lawsuits. As the discussion continued, Kroah-Hartman, whose appearance belies his gentleness, made an impassioned plea for tackling the matter as he had suggested.

Responding to Kuhn, who said: "In response, we have two options: we can all decide to give up on the GPL, or we can enforce it in Courts", Kroah-Hartman said, in an uncharacteristic outburst, "I call bullshit on this. And frankly, I'm tired of hearing it, as it's completely incorrect and trivialises the effort that thousands of people have been doing for 25+ years to preserve the rights that the GPL grants us."

And he added, in part: "By working with people, and showing them the BENEFIT of the GPL, we grow our community, ensure our survival, and win converts to the licence itself as now those people have a stake in it as their company relies on it."

At this point, Matthew Garrett, a former kernel developer and someone who was not attending LinuxCon, joined the discussion, pushing his view that a militant approach was better.

Perhaps Torvalds was annoyed by this; after all, he has had sharp words for Garrett on a previous occasion. Whatever the reason, Torvalds, who is not a member of the mailing list, responded soon after, and backed Kroah-Hartman to the hilt, describing the latter's earlier response as "a thing of beauty".

He backed the proposal to have a discussion on GPL enforcement but said no lawyers should be present, only developers. "I personally think this arguing for lawyering has become a nasty festering disease, and the SFC and Bradley Kuhn has been the Typhoid Mary spreading the disease," Torvalds said.

Typhoid Mary refers to Mary Mallon, a woman who was responsible for infecting 51 people with typhoid as she was the first American to become an asymptomatic carrier of the disease in the early 1900s.

Torvalds wasn't quite done. "I think the whole GPL enforcement issue is absolutely something that should be discussed, but it should be discussed with the working title 'Lawyers: poisonous to openness, poisonous to community, poisonous to projects'," he said.

"...quite apart from the risk of loss in a court, the real risk is something that happens whether you win or lose, and in fact whether you go to court or just threaten: the loss of community, and in particular exactly the kind of community that can (and does) help. You lose your friends.

"Because lawsuits — and even threats of lawsuits — make companies way less likely to see you as a good guy. Even when you're threatening somebody else, everybody else around the target starts getting really, really antsy."

After Garrett responded, Torvalds again pushed his argument about getting people to co-operate on GPL compliance by working from within a company, pointing out that the person who had filed the initial case about GPL violations in Busybox now regretted having done so.

Samba developer Jeremy Allison, who is on the board of the SFC, joined the discussion late, and pointed out that despite the Samba project having participated in the EU lawsuit against Microsoft, developers in Redmond and he were on good terms now.

"Samba and the FSFE were the last entities standing in the Microsoft vs EU anti-trust lawsuit. We even helped cost them over US$1b in fines. Next month I'll be going up to my second invite-only Microsoft plugfest of the year – this one set up specifically for the team that sued them. I'll be visiting several of my friends there, including one of their lawyers (although the rest of them are engineers," he wrote.

Overall, there was agreement on the need to carry on talks in private over GPL enforcement, rather than make a song and dance about it.


Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here

Active Vs. Passive DWDM Solutions

An active approach to your growing optical transport network & connectivity needs.

Building dark fibre network infrastructure using WDM technology used to be considered a complex challenge that only carriers have the means to implement.

This has led many enterprises to build passive networks, which are inferior in quality and ultimately limit their future growth.

Why are passive solutions considered inferior? And what makes active solutions great?

Read more about these two solutions, and how PacketLight fits into all this.

CLICK HERE!

WEBINAR INVITE 8th & 10th September: 5G Performing At The Edge

Don't miss the only 5G and edge performance-focused event in the industry!

Edge computing will play a critical part within digital transformation initiatives across every industry sector. It promises operational speed and efficiency, improved customer service, and reduced operational costs.

This coupled with the new capabilities 5G brings opens up huge opportunities for both network operators and enterprise organisations.

But these technologies will only reach their full potential with assured delivery and performance – with a trust model in place.

With this in mind, we are pleased to announce a two-part digital event, sponsored by Accedian, on the 8th & 10th of September titled 5G: Performing at the Edge.

REGISTER HERE!

BACK TO HOME PAGE
Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous

WEBINARS ONLINE & DEMAND

GUEST ARTICLES

VENDOR NEWS

Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News