Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

Thursday, 24 September 2020 11:12

Mozilla Foundation wants to control Firefox browser on Android

Mozilla Foundation wants to control Firefox browser on Android Courtesy Mozilla Foundation

The latest version of the Firefox browser for the Android platform appears to have diverged from its old philosophy of giving users control over the way they use the app, with some kind of iron control being wielded over what extensions one uses.

The old version gave one the freedom to download and use what extensions one wished to use and did not force the use of any extension down a user's throat.

But that seems to have changed. Now there is a list of recommended extensions. In other words, "we know what's best for you".

The change of attitude comes at a time when the Mozilla Foundation, the body behind Firefox, has sent 250 staff packing. Use of the browser is reported to have fallen by 85%.

Chief executive Mitchell Baker has seen her pay rise to US$2.4 million in 2018. The same report referred to above said 30% of the Foundation's expenditure is on administration.

A Mozilla spokesperson responded to a few queries that iTWire sent to the Foundation about the Android version of the browser. The queries and answers are given below in full.

Q: Why am I unable to download extensions of my choosing?

A: Extensions can add powerful customisation features to Firefox. However, we have noticed that sorting through add-ons can be overwhelming for many users. Even though our policy provides clear guidelines for the behaviour of add-ons, they sometimes find it difficult to decide which tools and developers they consider most trustworthy.

That's why we established the "recommended extensions" program: a collection of curated extensions that meet our highest standards for security, functionality and usability, and we have brought over the ones that have been optimised for mobile to Firefox for Android. We will continuously be adding more add-ons to the current list in the coming months and in the meantime we are looking forward to receiving feedback on the existing offering and suggestions for the future.

Would I be correct if I concluded that the makers of extensions listed by the browser as allowed have paid for this privilege?

Recommended extensions are editorially curated extensions that meet the highest standards of security, functionality, and user experience. Firefox staff, along with community participation, select each extension and manually review them for security and policy compliance before they receive Recommended status. Developers cannot pay for their extensions to be included in the Recommended Extensions program.

Developers also cannot pay for their extensions to be enabled on Firefox for Android.

Can I conclude that Mozilla now needs the money that comes from advertising and this is the reason why I cannot block what I want to block?

No, that is not correct. Tracking protection is actually tighter in the new Firefox for Android. Our default is Standard Tracking Protection which blocks third-party tracking cookies, social media trackers, cryptominers, and fingerprinters. Users can also switch to Strict Tracking Protection which also blocks tracking content, which includes many ads. We have made the top privacy and ad-blocking Web extensions available in Firefox for Android.

Apart from these answers, a Mozilla spokesperson also sent the following comment: "We made a decision to prioritise supporting add-ons that the majority of users relied on, were part of the recommended extensions program, and were compatible on mobile.

"We wanted to make sure that the first impression people have with add-ons on mobile is an exceptional, mobile-optimised user experience that is also secure. We have teamed up with more add-on developers (that are part of the recommended program) and will be releasing more compatible and secure add-ons with each upcoming release."

The Mozilla Foundation may not be very good at attracting users to Firefox, but it appears to be well-versed in the art of spin. There was a time when Firefox commanded 30% of browser users. With this kind of attitude, I would not be surprised if it lost all its users in a few years.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here

Now’s the Time for 400G Migration

The optical fibre community is anxiously awaiting the benefits that 400G capacity per wavelength will bring to existing and future fibre optic networks.

Nearly every business wants to leverage the latest in digital offerings to remain competitive in their respective markets and to provide support for fast and ever-increasing demands for data capacity. 400G is the answer.

Initial challenges are associated with supporting such project and upgrades to fulfil the promise of higher-capacity transport.

The foundation of optical networking infrastructure includes coherent optical transceivers and digital signal processing (DSP), mux/demux, ROADM, and optical amplifiers, all of which must be able to support 400G capacity.

With today’s proprietary power-hungry and high cost transceivers and DSP, how is migration to 400G networks going to be a viable option?

PacketLight's next-generation standardised solutions may be the answer. Click below to read the full article.


WEBINAR PROMOTION ON ITWIRE: It's all about webinars

These days our customers Advertising & Marketing campaigns are mainly focussed on webinars.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 2 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial.

This coupled with the new capabilities 5G brings opens up huge opportunities for both network operators and enterprise organisations.

We have a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you.


Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous




Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News