The bill, with the exception of its provision for account suspension, was welcomed by Internet NZ. Policy director Jordan Carter, said: "The draft legislation is broadly in line with the Cabinet paper released in December, and incorporates some improvements that InternetNZ suggested before Christmas...
"As drafted, this Bill sets out a regime that is focused on educating the public about their responsibilities to not infringe copyright, and provides an independent process that tests allegations of infringement before anything happens to ISP subscribers."
He added that the provision for account suspension remained "the only flaw," saying "Internet users would simply start a new account at another ISP. While suspension would require an order of the District Court, it is still unworkable and unnecessary."
The Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill repeals Section 92A of the Copyright Act and replaces it with a three-notice regime. It was introduced into Parliament by commerce minister, Simon Power, who said: "This amendment puts in place a fair and balanced process to deal with online copyright infringements occurring via file sharing."
It also replaces an earlier bill aimed at achieving the same goals, which the Government was forced to withdraw in March 2009 under pressure of intensive lobbying and public protest. The Government subsequently issued proposals for a revised regime, and requested submissions. After considering these it issued, in December 2009, a cabinet paper containing proposals that form the basis of the current bill.
The bill also extends the jurisdiction of the Copyright Tribunal, enabling it to hear complaints and award penalties of up to $15,000 based on the amount of damage sustained by the copyright owner. It also enables copyright owners to seek the suspension of Internet accounts through the District Court for up to six months.
Regulations to be drafted later this year when the bill has been enacted will outline the awards the Tribunal can make.
People accused of illegal downloading will have the chance to challenge notices and may request hearings at the Copyright Tribunal to contest infringement claims.
The bill puts the onus on ISPs to issue notices rather than right holders "because only they have access to account holders' personal information." However it will be up to rights holders to request the issue of a notice: ISPs will not be required to monitor users for possible copyright breaching behaviour.
It is envisaged that account suspension will be used on only the most serious cases. The Bill requires a court to consider factors like the account holder's reliance on access to the Internet.
Following the bill's first reading it will be referred to Select Committee where the public will have another opportunity to make further submissions on the legislation. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Economic Development will continue to consult with stakeholders on certain parts of the regulations. It is expected that the legislation will become law this year.