Category Sponsorship Banner Left

Performance 160x1200

Category Sponsorship Banner Right

Performance 160x1200



JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 63

Category Sponsorship Banner Middle

Wednesday, 23 May 2007 16:50

Letter: Market Clarity hits back at OECD in broadband stats battle

A highly critical analysis of the OECD's broadband statistics by Australian market research firm, Market Clarity, produced a swift rebuttal from the OECD (published by iTWire as letter to the editor). Now Market Clarity has hit back at the OECD. (Links in this letter have been added by iTWire)

From Shara Evans
Managing Director Market Clarity

The OECD has criticised the accuracy of some data points contained within our recent report on broadband in OECD countries. This criticism has ignored the comprehensive list of nearly 70 references (including URLs) to national statistics and regulatory publications from which Market Clarity's data is drawn, and the detailed discussion within the report on ambiguities pertaining to these national data sets.

We welcome factual correction, because given the enormous weight given to broadband "standings" around the world, we consider two aspects of the analysis to be absolutely vital: the information should be correct, and the data set should be subject to scrutiny vis-à-vis published data from official national sources.

Having put our belief in scrutiny on the record, we welcome it ourselves, and we look forward to the chance to enhance our data set with input from our colleagues in other countries, and once again make this information available for public inspection.

We also point out that other knowledgeable commentators, such Andrew Schmitt at Nyquist Capital (USA) describe the data in Market Clarity's report as "simply the best global broadband stats I've seen..."

Nonetheless, we need to look at the big picture - and debating the validity of specific data points ignores key findings in our report.

Indeed, it is Market Clarity's view that the broadband picture is not fully appreciated by looking at a single metric - broadband access connections per 100 inhabitants - a view that is shared by Australia's Minister for Communications  and the US Department of State, who in an April 2007 letter to the OECD, said:

"We are concerned about the methodology on which the new statistics were based, and their failure to capture important factors particularly their reliance on user subscriptions as a measure of broadband use." (Ambassador David A. Gross, United States Coordinator, International Communication and Infrastructure Policy, US Department of State)

Market Clarity believes that looking at broadband take-up by households or individuals is much more important than looking at the number of physical broadband access connections per 100 inhabitants - the measure currently used in the OECD's broadband league tables.

Indeed, one can argue that anything less than 100% household connectivity could be considered a failure in the broadband race.

Is high capacity infrastructure needed? Certainly.

However, one must also consider the full range of causal factors that impact why a household may not yet have a broadband service. Is it because of lack of broadband infrastructure? Is it because a family can't afford a broadband service? Or, is it because a family does not see the value in subscribing to a broadband connection?

There are follow-on policy implications for each of these scenarios, and infrastructure alone won't address the issues of affordability and awareness.

Another important aspect of broadband take-up is the speed at which subscribers connect to the broadband infrastructure. Are families connecting at the highest possible speed that the existing infrastructure can support? If the answer is "no" - is this because the packaging of broadband services encourages service take-up of lower speeds? This topic is also covered in our report.

We are also of the opinion that understanding what the citizens of each country have on offer for their entry-level broadband packages is just as important as broadband infrastructure related issues. In our report, we've included an examination of services from major carriers in each country, as an indicative metric describing the speed of "entry level" broadband plans.

This view is shared by the Australian Telecommunications Users Group (ATUG), who remarked on the correlation between market packaging and broadband take-up in their 18 May 2007 Newsletter.

In our report, we also examine the nuances of data collection across countries, and suggest that a margin of error should be applied to the ranking of country's performance. One need look no further than the difference in Australia's broadband numbers reported by the ACCC (3.6 million) and the ABS (3.9 million) for the period ending September 2006 to see evidence of how the methodology used to collect a country's source data can impact a country's standing.

We believe that our suggested approach of "banding" countries with very similar results into a single category has merit. According to The Australian (15 May 2007), the Australian Bureau of Statistics endorses this approach.

Market Clarity has produced this report because we consider the broadband debate to be of great importance. We stand by our decision to make this information public, because we firmly believe in the value of public data and public debate.

With this in mind, we have sought to offer readers of this document a rich data set - one which allows interested parties to link the information in our data set back to official country reporting on broadband - rather than being asked to rely on a "black box" as the source of their information.

It should also be understood that Market Clarity's decision to link our data set to published data from each OECD nation's statistical or regulatory body means that our analysis will also reflect any faults, deficiencies or vagaries inherent within each nation's source data set.

Market Clarity has fully disclosed the methodology used to compile our data set, and we've provided a comprehensive set of references to source data published by national statistics and regulatory bodies.

We also acknowledge that there was a production (paste) error in the last two columns of Table 10 in the first cut of our report, which we noticed shortly after the report was published on our Website. An updated version of the document was posted on our Website within 24 hours of publishing the original document. Because we made the research available for free download, and did not require registration, we had no way to ensure that every reader of the first version returned to download the correction.

We request that anyone who may have an earlier version of the Market Clarity report, download the most recent version.
To review the Market Clarity report visit:

** Editor's note: iTWire will not publish any further correspondence on this issue. Anyone interested in commenting or contributing is invited to use the comment facility provided.

Please join our community here and become a VIP.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here
JOIN our iTWireTV our YouTube Community here


It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinatrs and campaigns and assassistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.



iTWire TV offers a unique value to the Tech Sector by providing a range of video interviews, news, views and reviews, and also provides the opportunity for vendors to promote your company and your marketing messages.

We work with you to develop the message and conduct the interview or product review in a safe and collaborative way. Unlike other Tech YouTube channels, we create a story around your message and post that on the homepage of ITWire, linking to your message.

In addition, your interview post message can be displayed in up to 7 different post displays on our the site to drive traffic and readers to your video content and downloads. This can be a significant Lead Generation opportunity for your business.

We also provide 3 videos in one recording/sitting if you require so that you have a series of videos to promote to your customers. Your sales team can add your emails to sales collateral and to the footer of their sales and marketing emails.

See the latest in Tech News, Views, Interviews, Reviews, Product Promos and Events. Plus funny videos from our readers and customers.



Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous




Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News