Wednesday, 09 September 2020 11:22

US chip industry will lose in any tech war with China: claim Featured

By
US chip industry will lose in any tech war with China: claim Image by MasterTux from Pixabay

The American semiconductor industry will not survive a tech war with China, both US and Chinese tech industry sources have told the Asia Times, with the only party believing that Washington will prevail being the Trump administration.

Economist David P. Goldman explained that chip companies in the US needed the money that they earned from China to drive research and development, while Beijing merely had to produce rough-and-ready substitutes to meet its own needs.

Goldman's article was written after the news that the US was planning to place restrictions on China's largest chip maker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, broke.

He quoted an unnamed official from a big Chinese technology company as saying: "The scenario at the moment is that it’s just a matter of time before [the American chipmakers] don’t survive.”

The official expanded on this by pointing out that China would invest massive amounts in a bid to "displace US chip designers, chip software developers, and chip equipment manufacturers, and drive them out of the market".

Goldman said: "Companies at risk include designers like Qualcomm and Nvidia, chip software developers like Cadence and Synopsis, and equipment makers like Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA-Tencor.

"The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index lost 5.7%, or US$100 billion (A$138 billion) of market capitalisation, on 4 September following news reports that China was about to launch a massive program to develop so-called third-generation semiconductors as part of a US$1.4 trillion, five-year subsidy plan for tech industries."

There have been at least three predictions from knowledgeable sources after the restrictions placed on Huawei in May that the US would come off second-best in any tech war. 

Scott Kennedy, a senior adviser and trustee chair in Chinese Business and Economics at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC, was one; China expert Doug Fuller was the second and the third was the British international magazine, The Economist, which said the May strictures could drive part of the semiconductor industry out of the US, not exactly the outcome that power brokers in the US expected.

But this is the first time that any author has asserted, after additional sanctions were placed on Huawei's chip imports in August, that China would come out on top in a tech stoush.

American industry sources whom Goldman spoke to told him that SMIC was a bad target as it did not make custom chips for the People's Liberation Army, as Washington believes, according to The Wall Street Journal.

One consultant said: "The Chinese military doesn’t buy custom chips from SMIC. They get them from third parties on order from TSMC [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world's biggest fab].

“Most of what the Chinese military uses is off the shelf generic chips, just like the Pentagon. It costs US$500 million to design a custom chip. The Pentagon doesn’t have the budget for it. Neither does the PLA.

"So SMIC is not mainly for military applications. The WSJ and its sources have bad information. The White House isn’t looking at the facts."

Goldman wrote that the fact China was such a massive buyer of American technology meant that its factories could sub-contract out a job and make it impossible to track. US software to design chips has been bought in such volumes by Chinese firms that a host of start-ups could be given a single task, he pointed out.

"China is the world’s largest market for semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Fifty-six percent of Synopsis’ sales and 55% of Cadence’s sales were to foreign purchasers as of the second quarter of 2020," Goldman wrote. Synopsis and Cadence are American companies that make chip design software.

"In the case of chip designers, 92% of Nvidia’s sales and 89% of Qualcomm’s sales were overseas. China imports US$200 billion of semiconductors a year, most of which directly or indirectly contribute to revenues of US designers, software developers and equipment makers," he added.

Goldman explained that at the beginning of the year, the US Department of Defence had vetoed a proposal to place export controls on American semiconductor makers, on the grounds that it would reduce income and force cutbacks in funds for research and development. But the Trump administration went ahead in May and the scenario that the Pentagon had predicted was coming to pass.

He quoted a Chinese executive as saying, “The best case scenario for the Americans is an agreement on market share [in China], in which case the US companies survive. The scenario at the moment is that it’s just a matter of time before they don’t. China doesn’t have to export – they just have to produce for their own consumption and that wipes out the US companies.”


Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here

Now’s the Time for 400G Migration

The optical fibre community is anxiously awaiting the benefits that 400G capacity per wavelength will bring to existing and future fibre optic networks.

Nearly every business wants to leverage the latest in digital offerings to remain competitive in their respective markets and to provide support for fast and ever-increasing demands for data capacity. 400G is the answer.

Initial challenges are associated with supporting such project and upgrades to fulfil the promise of higher-capacity transport.

The foundation of optical networking infrastructure includes coherent optical transceivers and digital signal processing (DSP), mux/demux, ROADM, and optical amplifiers, all of which must be able to support 400G capacity.

With today’s proprietary power-hungry and high cost transceivers and DSP, how is migration to 400G networks going to be a viable option?

PacketLight's next-generation standardised solutions may be the answer. Click below to read the full article.

CLICK HERE!

WEBINAR PROMOTION ON ITWIRE: It's all about webinars

These days our customers Advertising & Marketing campaigns are mainly focussed on webinars.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 2 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site itwire.com and prominent Newsletter promotion https://www.itwire.com/itwire-update.html and Promotional News & Editorial.

This coupled with the new capabilities 5G brings opens up huge opportunities for both network operators and enterprise organisations.

We have a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you.

MORE INFO HERE!

BACK TO HOME PAGE
Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous

WEBINARS ONLINE & ON-DEMAND

GUEST ARTICLES

VENDOR NEWS

Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News

Comments