Monday, 27 July 2020 10:39

Huawei warns ASPI's anti-China tirade damaging bilateral ties, hurting Australian business Featured

Huawei warns ASPI's anti-China tirade damaging bilateral ties, hurting Australian business Image by kalhh from Pixabay

The defence industry lobby group Australian Strategic Policy Institute is acting to ratchet up tensions with Australia's major trading partner China and using funds it gets from the Federal Government for this purpose, more than $20 million at last count, the Australian arm of the Chinese telecommunications equipment company Huawei Technologies says in a strongly-worded blog post.

Huawei Australia chief corporate affairs officer Jeremy Mitchell said the only entities that would benefit from the slander that ASPI was indulging in would be American arms manufacturers from whom it received a sizeable part of its annual budget.

ASPI's sponsors include French defence contractor Naval Group, shipbuilder Austal, US defence contractor Lockheed Martin, US defence supplier Northrop Grumman, Swedish defence company Saab, the Australian arm of American defence contractor Raytheon, MBDA Missile Systems, French defence giant Thales, and Jacobs, a global provider of technical, professional, and scientific services.

Its so-called cyber arm, which puts out dubious "studies" like this, is sponsored by Services Australia, Microsoft, Google, au domain namespace administrator auDA, security firm Palo Alto Networks, Thales, Amazon, the Cyber Security Co-operative Research Centre, the National Archives of Australia, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, AWS, the Australian Signals Directorate, AISA, CyberCX, Facebook, Fortinet, Splunk, UpGuard, Jacobs and encryption company Senetas.

Mitchell said it was edifying to note that Telstra, formerly a major sponsor of ASPI's cyber arm, had ended its association with the lobby group at the end of the 2019 financial year. "It’s certainly the right move for any company that wants a productive China-Australia relationship," he added.

He did not mince his words. "The situation is almost too ridiculous for words. Australian taxpayers are forced to fund a ‘think-tank’ whose work actively damages Australia-China relations.

"While our current trade with China remains strong, the fact is the bilateral relationship is getting worse by the day. Who is benefitting from that? It’s certainly not Australia, it is not our farmers, it is not our educational sector, tourism, wine or mining industries and it is not those left on the wrong side of the ‘gigabit gap’ on the NBN who need world class broadband."

He said only ASPI's American sponsors would benefit from the toxic atmosphere being created. "Let’s be frank, ASPI’s US sponsors are not giving them millions of dollars to produce harmonious Australia-China relations – they are hardly going to benefit from that," he pointed out.

"The atmosphere that ASPI has helped create has generated a toxic environment in Australia-China relations. This has also forced fine people like Warwick Smith, a former minister in the Howard Government, to resign as chairman of the National Foundation for Australia-China Relations.

"Only last week the hugely respected Helen Sawczak stepped down as chief executive of the Australia China Business Council. You can’t blame Warwick or Helen for thinking 'What’s the point?' when ASPI’s work is going completely unchecked and they are being showered with increasing amounts of taxpayer funds by the Federal Government."

ASPI was operating only with government money when it was first set up by Hugh White, who is now a professor of strategic studies at the Australian National University. The money from defence firms started pouring in when Peter Jennings became the chief of ASPI.

The defence companies on ASPI's sponsor rolls account for a sizeable proportion of the weapons that are sold globally each year and used to slaughter people in wars around the world. An overwhelming number of ASPI's reports are about China and they are hawkish in the extreme.

White differs on the question of defence spending, telling the AFR that ASPI was involved in evaluating the military budget which it still does and this was incompatible with taking cash from the companies from which the military buys arms.

Mitchell said ASPI was now ratcheting up the fear, uncertainty and doubt against TikTok, another Chinese company.

"Never mind the fact that TikTok has done nothing wrong and has broken no laws in Australia – as former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull admitted in his own book, A Bigger Picture, if you are a Chinese company, your current innocence is annulled out by your presumed future guilt.

"The reality for companies like Huawei and TikTok is that we are pawns in the US-China trade war and countries like Australia have little choice, but to acquiesce if the US Government pushes them to ban a Chinese company. Even the UK, a country with far more political weight than Australia to enable it to push back against US demands, was forced to openly confirm that the recent change in its Huawei 5G policy was forced upon it by the US."

He quoted US President Donald Trump in this regard: "We convinced many countries, many countries, I did this myself for the most part, not to use Huawei, because we think it’s an unsafe security risk, it’s a big security risk. I talked many countries out of using it. If they want to do business with us they can’t use it.”

Mitchell said even a Liberal politician like former prime minister John Howard, a highly experienced hand in foreign affairs, had warned ASPI at the group's own Strategic Forum last week that Australia, the country it was supposed to be working for, was in danger of forgetting the bigger picture.

Mitchell quoted Howard as telling the audience at the ASPI event: “We must remember the endgame, and the endgame is to maintain, to the maximum extent consistent with our values, a good economic relationship with China.”

He said: "The problem is that ASPI doesn’t appear to be listening to even respected Australian political figures like Howard as it now not only publicly lobbies to have TikTok banned, but is also actively briefing the media that Huawei should also be restricted in other business areas such as solar energy.

"ASPI is now clearly starting to lobby against Chinese companies like Alibaba and Tencent which deliver cloud computing services to Australian businesses – something obviously in the direct interests of several of its major sponsors that offer the same services in Australia."

Mitchell said ASPI had a single tired argument: Chinese companies are beholden to China’s National Intelligence Law and would therefore be compelled to comply with any demands from the Chinese Government to hand over data – including data held in the cloud.

"If all Chinese companies are to be judged by that yardstick, then Australian companies are going to find it very hard to do business at all with Chinese companies in the future in which so much of our trade will be conducted digitally in the cloud as well as physically," he warned.

Mitchell said if the American Government and American corporate interests wanted to set up their own think-tank in Australia to represent their interests, then there would be nothing wrong with that. "But the Australian taxpayer should not be funding such an organisation to the tune of $20 million when we have so many other think-tanks that get nothing like that sort of funding," he said.

"Those other think-tanks are advocating for a far more sensible and practical approach to China and they actually put 'Australia first' and put our own economy and businesses at the heart of their policy formulations."

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here

Now’s the Time for 400G Migration

The optical fibre community is anxiously awaiting the benefits that 400G capacity per wavelength will bring to existing and future fibre optic networks.

Nearly every business wants to leverage the latest in digital offerings to remain competitive in their respective markets and to provide support for fast and ever-increasing demands for data capacity. 400G is the answer.

Initial challenges are associated with supporting such project and upgrades to fulfil the promise of higher-capacity transport.

The foundation of optical networking infrastructure includes coherent optical transceivers and digital signal processing (DSP), mux/demux, ROADM, and optical amplifiers, all of which must be able to support 400G capacity.

With today’s proprietary power-hungry and high cost transceivers and DSP, how is migration to 400G networks going to be a viable option?

PacketLight's next-generation standardised solutions may be the answer. Click below to read the full article.


WEBINAR PROMOTION ON ITWIRE: It's all about webinars

These days our customers Advertising & Marketing campaigns are mainly focussed on webinars.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 2 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial.

This coupled with the new capabilities 5G brings opens up huge opportunities for both network operators and enterprise organisations.

We have a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you.


Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous




Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News