Wednesday, 29 May 2019 19:34

Huawei seeks summary judgment in case against US Govt Featured

Huawei chief legal officer Dr Song Liuping speaking to the media in Shenzhen on Wednesday. Huawei chief legal officer Dr Song Liuping speaking to the media in Shenzhen on Wednesday. Supplied

Chinese telecommunications equipment vendor Huawei Technologies has filed a motion for summary judgment in its case against the US Government in which it has challenged the constitutionality of Section 889 of the 2019 National Defence Authorisation Act. The motion will be heard on 19 September.

The company filed the suit on 7 March, saying that Section 889 unfairly discriminated against it and prevented it from operating in the US.

Huawei chief legal officer Dr Song Liuping told the media in Shenzhen that the company had also called on Washington to halt its state-sanctioned campaign against Huawei as it would not improve cyber security.

Using cyber security as an excuse to ban Huawei “will do nothing to make networks more secure. They provide a false sense of security, and distract attention from the real challenges we face,” said Song.

“Politicians in the US are using the strength of an entire nation to come after a private company This is not normal. [It has] almost never [been] seen in history.”

Song said the the US Government had provided no evidence to show that Huawei was a security threat. "There is no gun, no smoke. Only speculation.”

One of the company's arguments in the case is that the ban on its products is a “bill of attainder” – a legislative act that condemns a particular person or group of people and punishes them with no trial. Bills of attainder are banned by the US Constitution.

A second allegation made by Huawei is that its rights to due process have been violated. The argument being made is that Congress has violated the constitutional principle of separation of powers by acting as judge, jury and executioner.

On Wednesday, Song said the summary judgment was being sought so that the court could issue a ruling in the fastest and most efficient way, declare restrictions on Huawei as unconstitutional and stop enforcement of related sanctions.

He also addressed the addition of Huawei to the Entity List by the US Commerce Department two weeks ago. On 16 May, the US imposed the ban on Huawei and 68 of its affiliates, preventing the company from importing components from American companies without government approval. Some of the affiliates are in other countries like Canada, Japan, Brazil, the UK, Singapore and others.

“This sets a dangerous precedent. Today it's telecoms and Huawei. Tomorrow it could be your industry, your company, your consumers,” Song said. “The judicial system is the last line of defence for justice. Huawei has confidence in the independence and integrity of the US judicial system. We hope that mistakes in the NDAA can be corrected by the court."

Huawei’s lead counsel for the case, Glen Nager, said Section 889 of the 2019 NDAA violated the Bill of Attainder, Due Process, and Vesting Clauses of the United States Constitution. Thus the case was purely “a matter of law” as there were no facts at issue, thereby justifying the motion for a summary judgment to speed up the process.

On 20 May, Google announced it was cutting off Huawei's access to future updates of Google's Android and Google Play Store. A day later, the US Commerce Department eased some of the restrictions, allowing Huawei to maintain and update existing networks and handsets for 90 days.

US President Donald Trump has also put in place a ban on the use of equipment from Huawei and its fellow Chinese firm, ZTE, within the US.


26-27 February 2020 | Hilton Brisbane

Connecting the region’s leading data analytics professionals to drive and inspire your future strategy

Leading the data analytics division has never been easy, but now the challenge is on to remain ahead of the competition and reap the massive rewards as a strategic executive.

Do you want to leverage data governance as an enabler?Are you working at driving AI/ML implementation?

Want to stay abreast of data privacy and AI ethics requirements? Are you working hard to push predictive analytics to the limits?

With so much to keep on top of in such a rapidly changing technology space, collaboration is key to success. You don't need to struggle alone, network and share your struggles as well as your tips for success at CDAO Brisbane.

Discover how your peers have tackled the very same issues you face daily. Network with over 140 of your peers and hear from the leading professionals in your industry. Leverage this community of data and analytics enthusiasts to advance your strategy to the next level.

Download the Agenda to find out more


Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.



Recent Comments