Home Government Tech Policy Google bid to quash mail seizure order thrown out

Google bid to quash mail seizure order thrown out

A magistrate judge in the US has ordered Google to hand over customers' mail messages it has stored abroad, arguing that since the company has access to them in the US they are subject to federal search warrants.

Google had made a bid to quash a warrant that was issued last year, seeking access to these emails.

In February, the search giant had been told that copying email from a server based outside the US, so that FBI agents would be able to see them as part of an investigation into a case of domestic fraud, could not be considered a seizure.

At this hearing, Google and the US government were both told by US Magistrate Judge Thomas Rueter that they would have to submit "a joint stipulation of undisputed facts relevant to the extraterritoriality analysis".

Additionally, Google was ordered to provide information about its ability to identify whether information is stored in the United States, "given its representation at the hearing that it was finalising a tool to identify whether or not content was stored in the United States". Also covered are the message content, attachments, metadata, and locational data.

Last year, Microsoft won the right to refuse federal authorities access to customer emails stored in Ireland that were sought in connection with a drug-trafficking case.

On Wednesday, US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler concluded (link from The Register): "The court denies Google's motion to quash the warrant for content that it stores outside the United States and orders it to produce all content responsive to the search warrant that is retrievable in the United States, regardless of the data's actual location.

The court took into account the mechanics of the Microsoft case, but said that it agreed with the argument of the judges who dissented when the government appealed the initial decision in favour of Microsoft.

"The service provider — Google — is in the district and is subject to the court’s jurisdiction; the warrant is directed to it in the only place where it can access and deliver the information that the government seeks," the court statement read.

It quoted from one of the dissenting opinions in the Microsoft appeal: “[I]f statutory and constitutional standards are met, it should not matter” where a service provider chooses to store the 1s and 0s."

And it added: "That conclusion is especially true here. Unlike Microsoft, where storage of information was tethered to a user’s reported location... there is no storage decision here. The process of distributing information is automatic, via an algorithm, and in aid of network efficiency. In sum, the disclosure is a domestic application of the SCA (Stored Communications Act)."


Did you know: 1 in 10 mobile services in Australia use an MVNO, as more consumers are turning away from the big 3 providers?

The Australian mobile landscape is changing, and you can take advantage of it.

Any business can grow its brand (and revenue) by adding mobile services to their product range.

From telcos to supermarkets, see who’s found success and learn how they did it in the free report ‘Rise of the MVNOs’.

This free report shows you how to become a successful MVNO:

· Track recent MVNO market trends
· See who’s found success with mobile
· Find out the secret to how they did it
· Learn how to launch your own MVNO service


Sam Varghese

website statistics

A professional journalist with decades of experience, Sam for nine years used DOS and then Windows, which led him to start experimenting with GNU/Linux in 1998. Since then he has written widely about the use of both free and open source software, and the people behind the code. His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.