The Federal Government is yet to properly define in its encryption bill what a systemic weakness means, and the question came up more than once for discussion during the second hearing on the bill before the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Security and Intelligence.
American cryptography fellow Riana Pfefferkorn has questioned what end the Federal Government's encryption bill is trying to achieve, asking whether the ends of keeping crime under control could not be achieved by other means.
One of the curious aspects surrounding the Federal Government's encryption bill is why it took Australian firm Senetas — which has technology exports of at least a billion — so long to voice its objections to the draft legislation.
Yeah that solar radiation is a mongrel.Wonder how the others handle the problem?You know like cloud storage and international phone[…]
did you figure out a way around it?
How do they ban? Do they hardware ban? I didn't do anything wrong either and got falsely banned permanently. How[…]
how long were you banned? Did you just log in and see that you could play again?
Security depends on definition of boundaries and enforcement of boundaries. Detection means that the boundaries have been violated.It is better[…]