Comments by a spokesperson from the US State Department, claiming that the US National Defence Authorisation Act, which included a ban on public procurement of Huawei technologies, was based on evidence, have drawn a sarcastic rejoinder from China.
Chinese telecommunications equipment vendor Huawei Technologies has filed a motion for summary judgment in its case against the US Government in which it has challenged the constitutionality of Section 889 of the 2019 National Defence Authorisation Act. The motion will be heard on 19 September.
Chinese telecommunications equipment vendor Huawei Technologies plans to follow in the steps of Russian security outfit Kaspersky Lab and sue the US Government over its ban on federal agencies using the company's products.
I agree in principle with the EFA statement.I would suggest however that the need is for a complete impartial review[…]
Isn't it amazing they way NBN Co manage to get these market survey results which support their activity and position.Are[…]
Another politically motivated statement of untruth.This is the party that gutted the original Labor commenced NBN for their own political[…]
No, not "up to a minute per day" - NBN Co says "potential burst durations between 1 to 50 seconds[…]
Actually, the growing shift to online services by Australians during the COVID 19 pandemic demonstrates the critical need to fix[…]