The controversial American security firm CrowdStrike, which was called in to investigate the alleged Russian hack of DNC servers in 2016, had no proof that any emails from the system had been exfiltrated despite public assertions that this had occurred, according to the transcript of an interview released by the US Government a few days ago.
Security firm CrowdStrike is touting for more business, beyond its base in the US. That's probably why the company has put out a mid-year threat report which mostly contains details of tactics, techniques and procedures.
Controversial American security firm CrowdStrike did not provide an unredacted or final report to the FBI after it was called in to examine the servers at the Democratic National Committee that were hacked in 2016 and which led to claims of Russian interference in the US presidential election of the same year.
There is a big difference between breaking the system and breaking into one person's account/device. In Australia the former is[…]
It is all an "Old Wives Tale" !
While you can only install apps such as Signal (messaging and voice/video calls) and WhatsApp (again messaging and voice/video calls)[…]
There would be no problem with demands to break encryption if it did not guarantee the integrity of every transaction[…]
If you agree that law enforcement authorities in the course of a LEGITIMATE investigation should have 'break and enter' power,[…]