A well-known researcher from security outfit Chronicle Security has questioned why tech and mainstream media have given blanket coverage to research by the US/Israeli firm Cybereason, which detailed intrusions into a number of telecommunications firms by a Chinese group known as APT10, when the research did not provide any indicators of compromise or accounts from victims.
The principle of the presumption of innocence is well-known: that a person, who is accused of something, is presumed innocent until proven guilty. But that does not seem to hold for the head of Kaspersky Lab, Eugene Kaspersky, or the company he heads. And particularly when the accuser is an American.
Processor manufacturer AMD has issued its first detailed statement on the flaws which were claimed last week to be in some of its product lines by the previously unknown Israeli firm CTS Labs.
This is how accountants and consultants solve technical problems - reframe the question or issue.So far NBN has blamed contractors[…]
Within 5 years, 5G will provide 90% of consumer end user connectivity, while fibre will carry the commercial point to[…]
ACCC invested in a speed test solution from Samknows (not you Sam) - a UK based company. The solution was[…]
Nah. Even the telcos agree that 5G mobile will not make the NBN redundant. There is not enough spectrum to[…]
I wonder how long before we get unlimited and fast mobile phone data, that can be shared with home tvs,[…]