Friday, 17 May 2019 09:55

US parts ban a setback for Huawei; American firms could suffer too Featured

US parts ban a setback for Huawei; American firms could suffer too Pixabay

ANALYSIS A trade pact between China and the US appears to be unlikely following the actions taken by the US Government against Chinese telecommunications equipment vendor Huawei Technologies on Thursday (Australian time), with the more serious ban being one that prevents Huawei from importing components from American companies without government approval.

The order extends to 68 affiliates as well, including some in other countries like Canada, Japan, Brazil, the UK, Singapore and others.

But the broader fallout could also affect American companies. According to the South China Morning Post, Greater China is Apple’s third largest market, contributing about 20% of revenue in 2018, while China, including Hong Kong, accounted for 67% of Qualcomm's sales last year and 17% of Broadcom's revenues.

Intel depends on China to such an extent that it reduced its full-year revenue forecast last month and missed analysts’ estimates for the first quarter as its China business was hit by a slowdown.

US President Donald Trump also put in place a ban on the use of equipment from Huawei and its fellow Chinese firm, ZTE, within the US but that would not have much effect on either firm as the US uses very little equipment from either company.

Huawei gear comprises less than 1% of wireless equipment in US networks. Ericsson and Nokia each account for 48%, while Samsung Electronics has 3% of the US$30 billion-a-year American market for mobile equipment, according to analyst Stefan Pongratz of Dell’Oro Group.

On the consumer business front, Huawei has anticipated some kind of adverse reaction from the US and has managed to largely become self-sufficient as far as components go.

But it needs a lot of parts from American companies to build its networking gear and the US move will definitely affect its ability to keep up with 5G network building commitments, both in China and other countries where it has won contracts. Last year, Huawei reported US$105 billion in revenue; the figure for 2019 is likely to be lower as the ban begins to bite.

Contract manufacturer Flex derives 7% of its revenue from Huawei, Broadcom 6% and Qualcomm 5%.

According to a listing in November 2018, Huawei considers 92 of its suppliers as core: of these 33 are US companies, 25 from mainland China, 11 from Japan and 10 from Taiwan. The remainder are from countries and regions including Germany, South Korea and Hong Kong.

The SCMP quoted Mo Jia, an analyst from the research firm Canalys, as saying that since the middle of 2018, Huawei had been trying to lessen its dependence on suppliers like Qualcomm and shifting to sources like Taiwan-based MediaTek. Huawei had also been building up a reservoir of US-made components so that it could keep going for at least six months in case there was some adverse action from the US.

Trump has signed the Huawei orders now because he had adopted a protectionist stance when he ran for office in 2016; seeing that it worked, he may well be calculating that he will be able to cow Beijing into a trade deal and thereby have something to wave around when he runs for re-election next year.

Given his erratic nature and unpredictability, one cannot rule out him completely changing tack in order to make himself look good. In the case of ZTE, he did a complete backflip and allowed the company to trade in the US after it was hit with a seven-year ban on using American-made parts in its equipment in April 2018 for violating the terms of an agreement over breaking sanctions on exporting products to Iran and North Korea.

ZTE shut down its main business activities in the US on 9 May last year. But following Trump's intervention, a deal was worked out for the Chinese firm to return to business by paying a fine of US$1 billion, changing its management team and depositing US$400 million in an escrow account against possible future transgressions.

One doubts, however, that Huawei will be counting on any such change of heart from Trump; the US actions have nothing to do with national security as claimed, and everything to do with preventing Beijing from overtaking Washington as the biggest global economy sometime in the near future.


Australia is a cyber espionage hot spot.

As we automate, script and move to the cloud, more and more businesses are reliant on infrastructure that has high potential to be exposed to risk.

It only takes one awry email to expose an accounts payable process, and for cyber attackers to cost a business thousands of dollars.

In the free white paper ‘6 steps to improve your Business Cyber Security’ you will learn some simple steps you should be taking to prevent devastating malicious cyber attacks from destroying your business.

Cyber security can no longer be ignored, in this white paper you will learn:

· How does business security get breached?
· What can it cost to get it wrong?
· 6 actionable tips



iTWire can help you promote your company, services, and products.


Advertise on the iTWire News Site / Website

Advertise in the iTWire UPDATE / Newsletter

Promote your message via iTWire Sponsored Content/News

Guest Opinion for Home Page exposure

Contact Andrew on 0412 390 000 or email [email protected]


Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.



Recent Comments