Open Source Market Segment LS
Open Source Market Segment RS
Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:51

Red Hat paid $US4.2m to settle patent suit: claim


Red Hat paid $US4.2 million to settle a patent infringement suit brought against it by FireStart Software, an intellectual property activist claims.

Florian Mueller, who made a name for himself during the campaign to prevent the adoption of software patents in Europe some years ago, said he had dug up a court filing that showed the payment had been made.

"The significance of this finding lies in how it reflects on Red Hat's credibility," Mueller wrote in his blog.

He said in the political and regulatory contexts, Red Hat insisted that open source licences (especially the GNU General Public Licence) were incompatible with payment of patent royalties. "...this simply depends on the specific terms and conditions of a deal," he added.

Mueller said Red Hat used the GPL as a pretext for refusing to offer its customers implementations of patent-encumbered standards such as the AVC/H.264 video codec.

"Another important credibility issue is that the world's largest open source company actually fails to be open about its patent-related dealings and positions, a fact that others have criticized (sic) before," he said.

"It hides behind self-imposed confidentiality obligations and employs legalese terminology that in the eyes of many laypeople will appear far more favorable (sic) to Red Hat than a straightforward representation of the facts would."

Red Hat has been contacted for comment.

Mueller says the payment made by Red Hat was kept secret but news about it surfaced in another suit. (PDF - 450k)

According to him, FireStar Software filed a suit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in 2006. It was alleging that a patent related to linked databases (US Patent No. 6,101,502) was being infringed by Hibernate, a JBoss product.

At the time that FireStar first approached JBoss, the process of its acquisition by Red Hat had begun. Mueller says that FireStar may have regarded this as "a financial opportunity".

"The patent-in-suit was later assigned to a Texas company named Datatern," he said. "An investment group named Amphion Innovations US, which owns a stake in FireStar and set up its wholly-owned subsidiary DataTern as a patent licensing company (i.e., a non-practicing (sic) entity), also became a party to the suit.

Mueller says the settlement related to any patents held by companies that might be infringed by Red Hat's products.

"Red Hat published a redacted version of the settlement agreement and a 'reader's guide' to it. the only part that had been redacted was Section 3, "PAYMENT".

"There were different references to that payment in the publicly available parts of the agreement (and the parties agreed to pay their own legal fees), but the amount was not stated anywhere else. Section 7 stipulates a confidentiality obligation concerning the section on payment."

Mueller said that after a while the plaintiffs sued the law firm that had represented them against Red Hat for alleged malpractice.

"In connection with that case (case no. 2:09-cv-00038, Eastern District of Texas), the parties initially didn't mention the amount paid by Red Hat, but then an additional group of companies came in: IP Navigation Group and affiliated entities.

"Those companies belong to Erich Spangenberg, who, according to, runs one of the 'largest, and most litigious, patent-holding companies' and recommends a 'sue first, ask questions later' approach."

Citing from, Mueller said it quoted patent defence company PatentFreedom, according to which "entities connected to Spangenberg have sued more than 500 [by now even more than 600] companies for patent infringement since 2005".

He says Spangenberg "became involved with the FireStar/Red Hat dispute when the right holders were unhappy about the state of affairs and brought him in as additional firepower to pressure Red Hat into a settlement.

"On October 1, 2009, Foley & Lardner (the firm that represented FireStar), amended its 'counterclaims, third-party complaint, and cross-claims', and paragraph 11 of that document made the following revelation: 'Of the $4.2 million settlement that the Plutus Parties [Spangenberg] obtained on behalf of Plaintiffs [Amphion/Datatern], the Plutus Parties took $3.4 million'."

Mueller added that statements made in such a court filing must have evidentiary support, "so we can rely on the accuracy of that information".


Mueller said that in a bid to appease the FOSS community, "in which there is a widespread belief that the GPL doesn't allow inbound patent licensing, Red Hat emphasized in its announcement that its settlement also covers 'community members' (upstream and downstream) as 'third party beneficiaries'. Indeed, Section 9.12 of the settlement agreement contained some provisions.

"In the press release announcing the deal, Red Hat's patent attorney Richard Fontana said: 'Red Hat's settlement satisfies the most stringent patent provisions in open source licenses, is consistent with the letter and spirit of all versions of the GPL and provides patent safety for developers, distributors and users of open source software'.

He said Eben Moglen of the Software Freedom Law Center reviewed the agreement and concluded that it would also be compatible with GPLv3 (although only GPLv2 was relevant to that particular deal). "He liked the fact that its terms 'provide additional protection to other members of the community upstream and downstream from Red Hat' and welcomed 'Red Hat's efforts on the community's behalf'."

Mueller added: "Considering a $4.2 million payment compatible with the GPL is, however, in contradiction with what Red Hat and its lobbying fronts claim in different political and regulatory contexts.

"For example, when the European Commission was updating its European Interoperability Framework (a set of procurement guidelines), Red Hat and its different lobby groups claimed that only royalty-free standards are compatible with the GPL and other important FOSS licenses (sic).

"I debunked that false claim and instead advocated a proper distinction between patent licensing terms and conditions that work for FOSS from those that don't. That is exactly the approach the EU took in the final version of those guidelines.

"I believe Red Hat should have told European policymakers the truth about its FireStar settlement and unknown number of other patent license (sic) deals in place instead of trying to gain a political advantage with incorrect claims that royalties are inherently GPL-incompatible."


Read 11853 times

Please join our community here and become a VIP.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here
JOIN our iTWireTV our YouTube Community here


Thoughtworks presents XConf Australia, back in-person in three cities, bringing together people who care deeply about software and its impact on the world.

In its fifth year, XConf is our annual technology event created by technologists for technologists.

Participate in a robust agenda of talks as local thought leaders and Thoughtworks technologists share first-hand experiences and exchange new ways to empower teams, deliver quality software and drive innovation for responsible tech.

Explore how at Thoughtworks, we are making tech better, together.

Tickets are now available and all proceeds will be donated to Indigitek, a not-for-profit organisation that aims to create technology employment pathways for First Nations Peoples.

Click the button below to register and get your ticket for the Melbourne, Sydney or Brisbane event



It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinars and campaigns and assistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.


Sam Varghese

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous




Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News