Stan Beer
Friday, 23 February 2007 14:43
Your IT -
Home IT
Page 3 of 3
"We’re not saying get rid of your existing productivity tools," says
Gough. "If those are working for you, that’s great. We’re saying the
thing that’s really going to make you exponentially more productive is
easy sharing of that information and that is accomplished by Google
Apps.
"Also there’s a large segment that’s underserved
by today’s productivity tools. Production workers and retail employees
for instance. 48% of all employees actually don’t even have an email
address. That’s because the cost of hardware, software and maintenance
has made it prohibitively expensive to provide email to employees.
"Google Apps is tremendously powerful for users that don’t have email
right now as well as users that frankly don’t use 80% of the features
of some of their productivity tools, while their companies are paying
100% of the price."
While Microsoft is trying convince users that the learning curve of its
newly released Office 2007 is worth the cost, Google's message appears
to be the exact opposite.
Gough says: "It happens that most people are choosing to work in an
online environment, a collaborative environment, an environment that
has a user interface that they know, with a familiar interface with
search in the center. They are choosing to use Google Apps because
they’ve seen how easy to use they are and how productive they can be at
home. So they’re saying why can’t they bring Google into the workplace
and have those same benefits and usability.
"This is especially key for growing companies. Google has adopted
Google Apps because we’re a high growth company and we’re hiring people
at a rapid rate. We can’t afford to have them be unproductive even for
that first week when they’re trying to figure out how to use their
calendar and email system. We need them productive from the first day
and that’s what Google Apps gives them."
Gough dismisses the argument pushed by desktop proponents that the
Archilles heel of Web 2.0 productivity tools is the necessity of being
online to access information.
“I think that we have a hyper-connected world," says Gough. "You don’t
have to be connected just from your computer to Google Apps. You can
also be connected from your mobile phone, your Blackberry or from a
kiosk at the airport. All those places are where business is getting
done and all those places are increasingly wired.
"That’s not to say that you can’t have off-line access to content.
Things like the ability to pop out your email and read it on any
program, whether it’s Outlook, open source, or an Apple program –
you’re able to do that. For Calendar, we support open standards. We
support iCal format so that you can export your calendar and you can
have it available offline."
Gough even has an answer for the old Microsoft lock-in argument, where
years of data is bound up in proprietary Microsoft Office files.
"It’s as simple as an email," he says. "I can actually email any
document I want to whether it’s Microsoft Office, HTML or text. Once
I’ve created it, I can email it to a special email address and
automatically it’s in Docs and Spreadsheets. Or I can open up Docs and
Spreadsheets, browse for a file on my local drive and upload it."
The coming months should prove interesting for both Google and
Microsoft, with both releasing new diametrically opposed products
representing the new and old worlds of IT. Some analysts are starting
to refer to Google Apps as a disruptive technology, a particularly
ominous phrase for Microsoft.