Home Your Tech Home Tech Dyson dumps dust filters, boosts cordless suction

Dyson's new DC54 vacuum cleaner has an attractive trick up its sleeve: unlike previous bagless designs, it doesn't need a filter. And the company has found a way to increase its cordless vacuum's suction.

Earlier bagless vacuums, including Dyson's, deposit most of the collected dust into the drum - but the really fine particles remain in the airstream until they are caught in the exhaust filter or filters.

As those filters collect dust the airflow becomes obstructed and the suction decreases, much as happens when an old-school vacuum bag becomes full. Cleaning a filter is a messier and more unpleasant job than just emptying a bagless vacuum's canister.

How did Dyson manage to dump the dust filter? Senior design engineer Martin Peek told iTWire that the project took six years from the original brief.

The team knew that using many smaller cyclones would capture smaller particles, so they shrank the nozzles inside the vacuum cleaner. The problem was that smaller nozzles were prone to blocking.

The solution was to fit a flexible tip to the nozzle. The tip then oscillates in the spinning airflow, and that movement keeps it clear.

But the degree of flexibility had to be exactly right. Too stiff, and blockages still occurred. Too flexible, and the nozzle collapses like a blocked drinking straw.

Getting the tips right took around three years, but it was worth it: the final design - dubbed 'Cinetic' (pronounced 'kinetic') - was tested to the equivalent of 10 years of domestic use and showed no loss of suction.

"It's an amazing achievement - you buy it, you use it; that's it," said Mr Peek.

Please read on for more on the DC54's performance, and news of Dyson's latest cordless vacuum.

WEBINAR 26/27th May

Thinking of deploying Business Intelligence (BI)? So are your competitors.

And the most important, fundamental, tool for delivering your BI information to your users? Dashboards.




VMware changed the rules about the server resources required to keep a database responding

It's now more difficult for DBAs to see interaction between the database and server resources

This whitepaper highlights the key differences between performance management between physical and virtual servers, and maps out the five most common trouble spots when moving production databases to VMware

1. Innacurate metrics
2. Dynamic resource allocation
3. No control over Host Resources
4. Limited DBA visibility
5. Mutual ignorance

Don't move your database to VMware before learning about these potential risks, download this FREE Whitepaper now!


Stephen Withers

joomla visitors

Stephen Withers is one of Australia¹s most experienced IT journalists, having begun his career in the days of 8-bit 'microcomputers'. He covers the gamut from gadgets to enterprise systems. In previous lives he has been an academic, a systems programmer, an IT support manager, and an online services manager. Stephen holds an honours degree in Management Sciences, a PhD in Industrial and Business Studies, and is a senior member of the Australian Computer Society.






Join the iTWire Community and be part of the latest news, invites to exclusive events, whitepapers and educational materials and oppertunities.
Why do I want to receive this daily update?
  • The latest features from iTWire
  • Free whitepaper downloads
  • Industry opportunities