Stan Beer
Tuesday, 06 June 2006 15:57
According to Netregistry, as part of the recent release of two letter
domain names, NetRegistry registered the ws.net.au and bs.net.au to
DomoWeb (http://www.domoweb.com), a business that provides web site
development and services.
auDA has reviewed the registrations and has rejected the registrant's
claim that the names are a close and substantial match to his business.
The two names were for websites; the first promoting Web Services
(ws.net.au) and the other promoting Business Systems (bs.net.au).
"NetRegistry disputes auDA's interpretation of their own policy rules.
We feel its findings in this matter are yet again arbitrary, petty and
arrogant," says Larry Bloch, CEO of NetRegistry. "We have decided to
refuse to comply with auDA's request that we delete these names to
highlight the abuse of our customers' rights to the names they want. To
our knowledge, auDA has not received a complaint or a competing claim
for these names. They are acting 100% arbitrarily," says Bloch.
"With decisions like this, Australia is becoming a nation where a
certificate of registration for a domain name means nothing, where a
domain name applied for, approved and paid for can still be taken away.
This is unacceptable to any business owner.
"I hereby publicly call on auDA to reverse its decision, to reinstate
the names to our customer and to put in place a suitable process to
appeal their arbitrary decisions."
We got this story too late to contact auDA today but will endeavour to get a response as soon as possible.
Think again. Most businesses only have PART of a DR plan - and this spells business disaster in the event of an IT disaster.
Download The Seven Sins of Disaster Recovery White Paper now and find out how you can prevent this happening to you.