Telstra has revealed the addition of almost one million new mobile services in the six months to December 2011, but Sensis revenues plummeted 24 percent in 12 months.
Australia's third largest ISP iiNet has been accused of inviting illegal downloads through its marketing messages by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) in the Federal Court today. As iiNet CEO Michael Malone took the stand for the third successive day in the dispute, AFACT alleged that iiNet has encouraged copyright infringement through its marketing strategy and unwillingness to act on copyright infringement notices.
AFACT alleged that iiNet's presentation of a
gigabyte of iiNet bandwidth or two as "more music downloads and more
time on Youtube" to customers is a potential encouragement of copyright
infringing mp3 downloads.
iiNet's welcome email was added to the downloading debate, with its sign
off reading, "Thanks for choosing iiNet. Happy downloading."
If iiNet is proven to be authorising copyright infringing downloads,
AFACT claims iiNet would not be protected by the safe harbour provisions
of the Copyright Act and would be liable for damages in relation to any
proven cases of copyright infringement by iiNet users.
Malone defended mp3 downloads, identifying legal options such as
downloading from Apple's iTunes.
"We oppose that we are authorising these transactions and that we should
be liable," said Malone of Category A copyright infringements, which
deal with the transmission of copyrighted content.
"I don't believe that every young person in Australia is downloading
illegally through BitTorrent," said Malone.
AFACT barrister Tony Bannon rejected iTunes as being relevant to the
debate as such downloads fall under 'freezone' downloads that are not
attributed to an ISP customer's download limit and so not pertinent to
iiNet customers as part of their download limit.
Bannon alleged that iiNet accepts that there are downloaders of
unauthorised copies of AFACT constituents' copyrighted materials on the
iiNet service and that iiNet has not actively sought to avoid these
users subscribing to their service.
Malone replied to this allegation saying, "I'd prefer them to go to
someone else so they'd get sued."
The issue of iiNet's failure to forward copyright infringement notices
from AFACT to customers was raised once again.
An email from an Internet Industry Association (IIA) representative
addressed to Malone presented in court stated that iiNet forwarding
copyright infringement notices to customers would lead to an implication
that ISPs should be taking responsibility for customer copyright
infringement.
A separate email between an iiNet employee and Malone that was presented
read, "These guys just don't get it. We are not obligated to do squat
on the AFACT allegations."
Yesterday it was established in court that iiNet had no written policy
to cover dealings with customers who are repeat copyright infringers.
Condition 1 of the safe harbour provisions of the Copyright Act states
that an ISP must adopt and implement a repeat infringer policy in order
to be covered for damages by the provisions. AFACT has interpreted
iiNet's failure to disconnect or warn customers of their copyright
infringement notices as a violation of this condition.
David Bass
| ComOps, a leading Australian provider of business software products and services, has won a competitive tender to deploy its Salvus safety, r…
How to Make Business Discovery Work for Your Business
Business Discovery takes its cues from consumer apps. Like Google, it encourages us- ers to hunt for and explore data without worrying about or even noticing the underly- ing technology. Their entire experience is working within an intuitive interface to get real-time, self-service results with only minimal training. ...more
Try an easy-to-use set of web-enabled
tools for business-class productivity services. Office 365 provides
anywhere-access to email, important documents, contacts, and calendars
on almost any device.
LATEST HEADLINES FROM YOUR IT
