Matthew Lentini
Monday, 02 November 2009 17:15
Your IT -
Home IT
Page 1 of 2
iiNet CEO Michael Malone has come out of his corner punching after taking the stand for the first time in the ISP’s defence against the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft action in the Federal Court today. However, Malone did make one important concession.
Malone conceded software piracy tracking
specialist DTecNet’s investigation on behalf of AFACT was “compelling
evidence” that should be reviewed by a third party and the courts.
Despite acknowledging DTecNet’s investigation, however, Malone
maintained iiNet still regards the past decade’s AFACT copyright
infringement notices as mere allegations rather than legitimate evidence
of infringement.
Malone reiterated the iiNet position that AFACT copyright infringement
notices were “unsubstantiated claims” and need court orders to be
enacted, therefore allowing them to maintain customer connections to
their service.
Malone said that if there were a notice from the court, iiNet would
cancel a customer’s service, but until then holds a policy of customers’
assumed innocence to allegations until proven guilty in court.
In cross examination, AFACT barrister Tony Bannon alleged email
correspondence between Malone and iiNet subsidiary Westnet management
staff were urged to take a stance that was “a little less proactive” in
regards to Westnet’s policy toward forwarding AFACT notices onto
customers.
This policy was not consistent with iiNet’s own policy, says Malone, and
all Westnet policies had to change to match iiNet’s own after its
acquisition on the 19th on May, 2008 when it became a “wholly owned
subsidiary of iiNet.”
Malone has taken a firm stance against further forwarding of
“unsubstantiated claims” from AFACT onto customers as they would be
“damaging to the industry” and harm customers’ image of iiNet.
CONTINUED Page 2
LATEST HEADLINES FROM YOUR IT
