Davey Winder
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 17:49
Your IT -
Home IT
Page 2 of 2
So what is going
on here and why has the traditional British freedom of the press been
trodden upon with such a big boot. Ask any British journalist and they
will tell you that Media 101 says 'you can report on parliamentary
proceedings without fear of legal repurcussion' it's a fundamental
right.
Which is why journalists, who now inhabit Twitter like seagulls at a
rubbish tip, quickly started digging up whatever they could and posting
their thoughts as tweets. The reference to Carter Ruck solicitors in
the original Guardian story was enough for them to discover that an MP
was to ask a parliamentary question (today) regarding how the British
Government would protect whistleblowers and reporters.
Now the gagging order has been lifted, we can publish the full text of
the question concerned and you can see exactly what all the fuss has
been about:
"To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made
of the effectiveness of legislation to protect (a) whistleblowers and
(b) press freedom following the injunctions obtained in the High Court
by (i) Barclays and Freshfields solicitors on 19 March 2009 on the
publication of internal Barclays reports documenting alleged tax
avoidance schemes and (ii) Trafigura and Carter-Ruck solicitors on 11
September 2009 on the publication of the Minton report on the alleged
dumping of toxic waste in the Ivory Coast, commissioned by Trafigura"
to be asked by Labour MP Paul Farrelly of Justice Secretary, Jack Straw.
Back in September it was The Guardian which covered the
toxic waste
dumping story
and claimed that UK oil trader Trafigura's libel lawyers, Carter-Ruck,
had blocked it from reporting beforehand. Only after Trafigura
announced it was paying millions of pounds in compensation, but without
admission of any liability over the allegations from 2006, was The
Guardian finally free to publish its account.
Now Twitter is back on the case after it got wind of the Guardian
gagging order over reporting a parliamentary question. Not only were important questions asked about how this had been allowed to happen but
there were even 'Ungag the Guardian' twibbons being worn by many
users to show support.
Those tweets not only called for MPs to debate the matter, but also for
the mainstream media to cover it. Pleas that did not go unanswered.
Leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg, has today tweeted that he
was very concerned about the story and his party was "planning to take
action on this".
It would seem that all the pressure paid off, and I for one am
convinced that the power of Twitter played a large part in common sense
prevailing in what was a vital case concerning freedom of the press. It's nice to see that the political power of Twitter has not been diminished by
recent cases where The Powsers That be have tried to prevent it from being used as a tool for the people.