No. 1 Story

ACCC clears Optus to scrap HFC network and use NBN instead

The ACCC has cleared, provisionally, the proposed deal between Optus and NBN Co under which Optus is to be paid around $800m to shut down its HFC network and transfer customers onto the NBN. read more

Related Articles

Adoption of cloud computing has reached a tipping point  - but don’t expect legacy...
In yet another blow to the Facebook IPO this week, following the withdrawal of...
Recruitment technology and social media have played a significant role in growing business in...
Need a new One with 4G speeds at an XL size, while still being...
Kogan's latest Agora tablet offers the joys of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich with...

Eolas sues technology and retail giants

Your IT - Home IT

On Tuesday October 6, Eolas gained patent number 7,599,985 (985), a continuation of the 906 patent. According to copmpany officials, the 985 patent describes how websites can add fully-interactive embedded applications to their online offerings through the use of plug-in and AJAX (asynchronous JavaScript and XML) web development techniques.

The company believes a variety of companies have infringed these patents in their web sites or products, and immediately took legal action.

The defendants in the case brought by Eolas include Adobe, Amazon, Apple, Argosy Publishing, Blockbuster, CDW, Citigroup, eBay, PepsiCo subsidiary Frito-Lay, Go Daddy, Google, J.C. Penney, JPMorgan Chase, New Frontier Media, Office Depot, Perot Systems (which is in the process of being acquired by Dell), Playboy Enterprises, Rent-A-Center, Staples, Sun Microsystems, Texas Instruments, Yahoo!, and Google subsidiary YouTube.

The case has been brought in the Eastern District of Texas, a venue regarded as being favourable to patent holders.

"We developed these technologies over 15 years ago and demonstrated them widely, years before the marketplace had heard of interactive applications embedded in Web pages tapping into powerful remote resources," said Michael Doyle, Eolas chairman and co-inventor of the patent.

"Profiting from someone else's innovation without payment is fundamentally unfair. All we want is what's fair," he added.

Clearly, Berners-Lee and others dispute that the innovation in question really was Eolas's.