No. 1 Story

HP job cuts loom for Australian employees

A number of Australian employees of Hewlett-Packard are facing the loss of their jobs as the global computer giant looks to slash its worldwide workforce by up to 30,000.

read more

Related Articles

Adoption of cloud computing has reached a tipping point  - but don’t expect legacy...
In yet another blow to the Facebook IPO this week, following the withdrawal of...
Recruitment technology and social media have played a significant role in growing business in...
It's no longer unusual for a household or small business to use a mixed...
D-Link's latest wireless router is claimed to be three times faster than Wireless N...

Taking the Myki

Your IT - Home IT

This is not intended as a suggestion that you do “cheat the system,” instead I’m simply trying to identify failings in the design.

The biggest problem is the scan-on / scan-off process.  By reducing the level of human involvement, the ease and desire to ‘bypass’ the system increases.  So, how difficult will it be to scan on to the vehicle, wait a few minutes and scan off again?  When you eventually reach your destination, simply avoid the scanner.  If challenged, simply scan – it will be recorded as the start of a new journey, and suddenly you’re out-of-sequence!  Use your next journey to re-sequence by judiciously scanning three times again.

Alternately, how well does the system handle multiple, repeated scans?  I can imagine (no, I’ve experienced it) being so jammed on a tram that my card could easily be scanned repeatedly as I’m pressed against the reader.  Alternately, in the same situation, others would not be able to scan off at all.  According to the Myki website such situations will be charged as a “default fare.”  Which presumably will be the maximum possible fare from wherever those passengers boarded.  I’m not too sure I would want to be the complaints officer handling all those calls.  Alternately, people may not notice that they’re being regularly overcharged – perhaps that’s how the system will pay for itself!

Some time ago, Roger Clarke, Australia's leading privacy proponent commented “I don't want to be unduly negative, because this is a 10-year-old solution that's been cocked up many times in many places, especially (but not only) in Australia.  But the lack of hard information on the site makes you fear that they may have cocked it up again ...”  Nothing I’ve seen would suggest any of us disagree.