No. 1 Story

HP job cuts loom for Australian employees

A number of Australian employees of Hewlett-Packard are facing the loss of their jobs as the global computer giant looks to slash its worldwide workforce by up to 30,000.

read more

Related Articles

Adoption of cloud computing has reached a tipping point  - but don’t expect legacy...
In yet another blow to the Facebook IPO this week, following the withdrawal of...
Recruitment technology and social media have played a significant role in growing business in...
Ever come to grief walking down the street while reading or composing a text...
The Babel Fish was a creation of science fiction author Douglas Adams that could...

Microsoft counsel bags Google book search

Your IT - Home IT

Google Book Search "systematically violates copyright and deprives authors and publishers of an important avenue for monetising their works," a Microsoft lawyer has claimed.

In a prepared address to the annual meeting of the Association of American Publishers, Thomas Rubin - Microsoft's associate general counsel for copyright, trademark and trade secrets - repeatedly criticised Google's activities in this area.

Rubin suggested "three simple principles [that] can help us make the right choices": expansion of access to online content, respect for the legitimate interests of copyright holders, and cooperation in order to provide consumer-friendly, cost-effective online access to content.

While Google's goal is to make every book ever published searchable, "Google's broader business model is straightforward – attract as many users as possible to its site by providing what it considers to be 'free' content, then monetize that content by selling ads," he said.

Rubin also claimed that despite acquiring rights to certain books from various publishers, "in late 2004 Google basically turned its back on its partners. Concocting a novel 'fair use' theory, Google bestowed upon itself the unilateral right to make entire copies of copyrighted books not covered by these publisher agreements without first obtaining the copyright holder’s permission."

The approach adopted by Google "undermines critical incentives to create", he added.

What's Microsoft doing differently?