William Atkins
Sunday, 21 September 2008 21:56
Science -
Health
Page 2 of 4
SECOND ARTICLE
The second article asks the question:
“Are tanning beds "safe"? Human studies of melanoma.”
It is authored by Marianne Berwick, of the University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A.
Its
abstract includes the statements:
“Controversy continues over the carcinogenic properties of tanning beds. The tanning industry "sells" tanning beds as a safe alternative to UV exposure for both tanning as well as vitamin D biosynthesis.”
It asks another question,
“But, how safe are tanning beds?”
And, adds,
“Epidemiologic data – incomplete and unsatisfactory – suggests that tanning beds are not safer than solar ultraviolet radiation and that they may have independent effects from solar exposure that increase risk for melanoma.”
Dr. Berwick states that there appears to be a distinct relationship between sunbed use and melanoma.
However, she admits that the data collected so far could be inaccurate based on measurements of sunbed exposure and other such relevant factors such as genetics.
Berwick concludes by saying:
•
"Until these factors are better characterized, we must exercise caution in evaluating the extent of the risk for cutaneous melanoma posed by sunbeds."
• "Nonetheless, because of this very uncertainty, the data do not support a claim that sunbeds are safe, and such claims should be considered misleading."
The full article can be read at “
Are tanning beds "safe"? Human studies of melanoma.”
Page three discusses the third article.
