Warning this article may contain opinions of the author that you and iTWire don't necessarily agree with. Don't let them get away with it - have your say with a comment!

No. 1 Story

Construction needs cloud flexibility

Australia’s embattled construction sector could benefit from cloud based information systems that can be switched on and off in lockstep with individual projects – with the exception of those organisations based in remote areas like the Kimberleys.

read more

Senator Conroy, thou knowest not the scorn to be brought down upon thine head

Opinion and Analysis

Today, Australia's supposed technology leader announced his Luddite status to the world at large.  I ask you Sir; if it is 'one man, one vote,' why is MY vote worth so much less than Senator Fielding's?

If it isn't already obvious, I am angry, nay very angry, about the government's decision to proceed with the nanny-filter.  Let me explain.

A long time ago, Senator Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, announced that his government would investigate the possibility of an Internet filter that would keep the Labor Party in power protect the children from the nasties on the Internet (He claimed that we all voted for this particular policy at the last Federal Election).

We all laughed.

A little later the Senator asked Australia's ISPs to help with a trial of the various filtering technologies.

We all laughed again.

Today, the laughing stopped.  Enex Testlab, the appointed evaluation consultants delivered their report and Senator Conroy announced that the filter would become law in the new year.

The problems with this idea are so numerous that it would numb the mind of any sensible person to list them all.

However, let's try.