Home opinion-and-analysis UNI-verse Questionable space- and Earth-funding ideas of U.S. Congress

Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

Get all your tech news delivered to your mail box five days a week
iTWire UPDATE - it's FREE!


Although it looks like the United States will reluctantly agree to fund the International Space Station through 2020, the decision isn’t a done deal even though its space-faring partners around the world readily support the idea. Isn't this a part of a bigger problem called consistency?


Why do we start giant projects (or even smaller ones), whether in space or on Earth, and abandon them prematurely? I am perplexed by that concept?

The April 10, 2009 Wall Street Journal article “Space Station Nears an Extension” states, “The U.S. and major foreign partners on the International Space Station have agreed in principle to keep it operating through 2020, at least five years beyond the current deadline, according to government and industry officials.”

It adds, “But prolonging the facility's life, particularly in the midst of the current global economic turmoil, could also force some tough question within the U.S. space program. Washington could have to spend $10 billion or more between 2015 and 2020 to continue using the space station -- potentially siphoning dollars from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's annual budget of more than $18 billion, primarily from projects intended to return U.S. astronauts to the moon by 2020.”

The space station isn’t even completed and yet members of the U.S. Congress are still considering the abandonment of a fully functioning structure. I wonder about this logic!

Doesn’t this seem a bit wasteful. How would you like it if the city you lived in decided to build a new school with your tax dollars, and you approved it, and in the middle of the project they decided it was too expensive and stopped?

I don’t really care if you support or don’t support the International Space Station.

However, any project that is approved by Congress, developed, and completed, in my estimation, should be continued until it can’t go on any longer. If the Space Station is ready to fall apart and is no longer safe for human occupancy, then it is time to pull the plug. But, that time isn’t even close to being here.

It’s like building a superhighway across the country, or a bridge across the Mississippi River, or a tunnel in New York City, and as soon as they are finished you tell the country we aren’t going to maintain them anymore because we don’t have any money or we’ve changed our minds and they are no longer of interest to the country.

Page two continues.

RECRUITMENT & RETENTION REPORT 2013

HIRE OR FIRE? BUY OR BUILD

2013 is well underway and Australian companies need to know whether they should invest in IT skills training or pay a premium for the people they need.

If you want to know which choices are being made in your sector, what skills are hard to find, which sectors intend to hire or fire and where the IT spend is going, this free report is must have.

GET YOUR REPORT NOW

William Atkins

William Atkins completed educational degrees in science (bachelor’s in physics and mathematics) from Illinois State University (Normal, United States) and business (master’s in entrepreneurship and bachelor’s in industrial relations) from Western Illinois University

Connect

http://bs.serving-sys.com/BurstingPipe/adServer.bs?cn=tf&c=19&mc=imp&pli=5460041&PluID=0&ord=[2000]&rtu=-1