The Government has offered Australia's three mobile operators, and vividwireless, renewal of their existing spectrum allocated on 15 year licences in the late 90s and early 2000s at set prices, while the Government expects to rake in $3 billion.
Will the amount allocated to deployment and other expenses be reduced? Does this mean the quality will suffer? Or will it go over budget too? And by goodness, no matter the technology, if the project is going to exceed $2,245 per student then the taxpayers will definitely want to know!
What I also want to know is whether Linux was actually considered.
Let me get one thing straight: this isn’t simply some sort of militant Linux question? I ask with earnestness. To me, Linux makes sense.
Firstly, it gives the full amount to hardware without a “Windows tax” involved.
Secondly, it gives students a full and rich suite of legal software to use without having to pay more money or resort to piracy.
I think it is safe to say Microsoft recognised – particularly with the tabled price-point – that Linux was going to be a strong option here. Imagine their horror at the thought of a couple of hundred thousand Linux-based laptops being issued to the future workforce and decision makers?
It doesn’t surprise me that Microsoft would have pursued this tender with aggressive pricing and negotiating. However, unless the software is being given away at no cost whatsoever it involves a necessary sacrifice on hardware to cover the Windows bar tab.
Even if Microsoft is giving its goodies away (which I doubt) the decision to use a Microsoft platform still hampers students. They will by necessity require resource-stealing anti-virus software. They will be confronted with expenses if they wish to upgrade to newer versions of Microsoft’s products.
I want to know who submitted Linux based proposals. I’m expecting innovative hardware makers like ASUS to have been in on the act. It was they who created the netbook market single-handedly with the ASUS Eee. I’m expecting budget manufacturer Acer – of Acer Aspire One fame – to have put in. I’m expecting Novell to have submitted SUSE Linux as a potential, and similarly from Red Hat and Canonical (Ubuntu.)
Then again, could it be that Linux advocacy is so grassroots-focused that the request for proposals on this scale was completely missed and overlooked? What an epic fail it would be if it simply turned out everybody expected a Linux solution to be submitted and nobody actually did it!
Or, could it be that DET heard the old adage “Nobody got fired for choosing IBM” and applied it to Microsoft?
Were the Microsoft and Linux solutions compared based on price and performance? Or did a DET official just choose the “safe” choice, to the detriment of education and taxpayers state-wide?
David Bass
| ComOps, a leading Australian provider of business software products and services, has won a competitive tender to deploy its Salvus safety, r…
How to Make Business Discovery Work for Your Business
Business Discovery takes its cues from consumer apps. Like Google, it encourages us- ers to hunt for and explore data without worrying about or even noticing the underly- ing technology. Their entire experience is working within an intuitive interface to get real-time, self-service results with only minimal training. ...more
Try an easy-to-use set of web-enabled
tools for business-class productivity services. Office 365 provides
anywhere-access to email, important documents, contacts, and calendars
on almost any device.
