I’m sure a company would find much greater benefit in the unencumbered standard releases of Windows Server and Exchange server. Of course, these packages cost money, and a lot of it.
So, it stands to reason SBS has a reason to exist; it’s cheap(er) – but as a result, it’s limited. It’s not the base product of the Windows Server line but instead a cut-down version to try and reach those who are not able, or do not wish, to pay Microsoft’s fee.
Frankly, I think you’d only choose SBS because you’re working to a specific budget. I don’t believe anyone chooses to buy SBS because of perceived feature advantages.
So why use SBS at all? There are free open source Linux alternatives which range from free to inexpensive – but without the same restrictions. Today and Sunday I’m going to tell you about Linux-based choices which free you from the shackles SBS imposes. I’ll begin with one today after some ground rules, and then four more next time.
Firstly, let's set a baseline so the expectations are managed. I've primarily referred to Windows Server and Exchange Server because these are, to my mind, the two major components being the server operating system and the mail and calendar system.
It's true SBS includes other elements; the higher tiers of the SBS (and new Essential Business Server, EBS) include SQL Server and ISA Server. The former is a database engine, the second a firewall and proxy engine.
I don't believe either of these is important for the purposes of this comparison. That's not to say Linux can't do what they can; far from it. Linux has MySQL - now owned by Sun Microsystems - as well as a legion of firewall and proxy tools.
The reason I assign them lesser importance in terms of comparison is threefold. First, they're not part of the base SBS product. You need to explicitly select and purchase a different product.
Second, SQL Server is not a product you just load and "use"; it serves as the data store for other applications. So, it is not really meaningful to compare two database systems per se when their usage is subject to something else.
Third, the reason to compare SBS with Linux is to emulate a degree of functionality provided by a largely "out-of-the-box" solution. I believe if you are working in, say, ISA Server then you ought to have the nous to configure a Linux-based firewall product. You've gone beyond the type of user who depends on a point-and-click step-through-the-wizard interface.
Here are some quick links to help you navigate around.
Page 1 – The baseline
Page 2 - What I expect from a Linux solution
Page 3 – A word on the money side
Page 4 – Option 1: ClarkConnect and reader feedback
Linux alternatives to Windows SBS part one
RECRUITMENT & RETENTION REPORT 2013
HIRE OR FIRE? BUY OR BUILD2013 is well underway and Australian companies need to know whether they should invest in IT skills training or pay a premium for the people they need.
If you want to know which choices are being made in your sector, what skills are hard to find, which sectors intend to hire or fire and where the IT spend is going, this free report is must have.
David M Williams
David has been computing since 1984 where he instantly gravitated to the family Commodore 64. He completed a Bachelor of Computer Science degree from 1990 to 1992, commencing full-time employment as a systems analyst at the end of that year. Within two years, he returned to his alma mater, the University of Newcastle, as a UNIX systems manager. This was a crucial time for UNIX at the University with the advent of the World-Wide-Web and the decline of VMS. David moved on to a brief stint in consulting, before returning to the University as IT Manager in 1998. In 2001, he joined an international software company as Asia-Pacific troubleshooter, specialising in AIX, HP/UX, Solaris and database systems. Settling down in Newcastle, David then found niche roles delivering hard-core tech to the recruitment industry and presently is the Chief Information Officer for a national resources company where he particularly specialises in mergers and acquisitions and enterprise applications.
