Home opinion-and-analysis Open Sauce gEdit shows that GNOME wants to drive users away

Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

gEdit shows that GNOME wants to drive users away Featured

The GNOME Desktop project often gets a lot of flack for its design decisions, many of which turn perfectly good, usable applications into unusable crud.

It hasn't affected me at all so far because I don't use either GNOME or KDE; a simple desktop like LXDE is far better suited to my needs - and anyway, even if I wanted to run either of these two bloated desktops, my laptop, a 10-year-old IBM Thinkpad, wouldn't be able to take the load.

But the GNOME text editor, gEdit, has always been an application of choice for me. Today, I was forced to make a change.

Debian, the distribution I use, is somewhat conservative in its approach and even though I run the testing stream on my laptop, the new version of gEdit came through as an update only this morning. I see that many others got to sample its delights back in January. One must thank the Almighty for small mercies - at least it wasn't foisted on me that early in the year.

Until this latest avatar, 3.12.1, landed, gEdit looked like any other text editor. It had regular menus, all the basic stuff that one needs to write. Plus tabs. That was the killer bit; you could have 15 articles open for reference, they would all sit in the one window. They were never strewn all over the place - and when you work predominantly on a 15" laptop, that one feature is worth its weight in gold.

But the creators of gEdit apparently were not satisfied with this editor. No, they want people to "focus" on what they are writing. It looks like the developers were under the impression that it was impossible to get any serious work done in gEdit. To quote, from the blog of gEdit developer Ignacio Casal Quinteiro, "The goal of this work is to create a modern, slicker interface which wastes less screen estate and lets you focus on the text or code you are writing. No features were harmed in the making of this new UI."

I have no problem with the change of user interface - provided that there is some way for me to get back the old interface if I choose to do so. After all, free and open source software is supposed to be about choice. One doesn't expect the software Taliban to set things in stone.

But that is exactly what has happened. The GNOME developers do not want people to read - so they have removed the standard menus, the ones that you get in every text editor, those that say New, Open, View and so on and provided a number of inscrutable icons. Every illiterate can now use gEdit - though one doubts that literate people will continue using it anymore. The tabs are still there - but this UI has ended my affair with gEdit.

The menu choices that existed on the left are now on the right. There is lots of wide open space - presumably for people to "focus". In the past, apparently,  people could not focus and were unable to write 10 words without having to get up and roam around the room 10 times.

Here's a bit more from that blog: "plugins that interacted with the menu will need to be adapted to the new API. We are a bit sorry we had to (partially) break the plugin API again, but this cannot be helped since with the current manpower we can focus on a specific set of changes during each cycle."

Great stuff. The GNOME project is almost 17 years old. When will we see some signs of maturity, some signs of stability? It shows that the people at GNOME just want change. Like the good folks at Microsoft who want to change, change, change, until the software becomes utterly unusable, the GNOME developers want to keep changing things too.

I've moved, initially to KWrite which looks promising; kate, the other text editor from KDE, is too much for my needs. LXDE's Leafpad is too basic and the office suites are too full of unnecessary features.

FREE CLOUD BACKUPS MANAGEMENT WEBINAR

Are your technicians spending too much time just managing your clients cloud backups?

Backups are an important part of any IT business but they should not consume more than their fair share of time and money.

Discover how to reduce the amount of time & money spent managing your Cloud Backups during this Free Webinar.

REGISTER FOR FREE WEBINAR!

FREE NETWORKING SERVICES CASE STUDY

As one of the world’s largest social networking services, Facebook handles a lot of user information, and requires input from an astounding range of stakeholders 24 hours a day, 7 days a week — from both inside and outside the business.

Discover how Facebook was helped to connect remote employees, vendors, consultants, and partners to applications and web services quickly and reliably - without risking sensitive data.

GET CASE STUDY!

GET THE IT BUDGET YOU WANT

Explore your Network Treasure Trove to get the IT Budget you want

With Australian businesses projected to spend over $78.7 Billion why does it feel like you can never get the budget you need?.

In most cases your budget will get approved because the proposals are not only technically correct, but also provide good, credible evidence on how the spend aligns with key business objectives.

Did you know that your Network Monitoring tool can help you build a comprehensive business case without an MBA?

HERE ARE 8 TIPS TO GET THE IT BUDGET YOU WANT.

CLICK HERE!

Sam Varghese

website statistics

A professional journalist with decades of experience, Sam for nine years used DOS and then Windows, which led him to start experimenting with GNU/Linux in 1998. Since then he has written widely about the use of both free and open source software, and the people behind the code. His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Connect

 

 

 

 

Join the iTWire Community and be part of the latest news, invites to exclusive events, whitepapers and educational materials and oppertunities.
Why do I want to receive this daily update?
  • The latest features from iTWire
  • Free whitepaper downloads
  • Industry opportunities