Sam Varghese
Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:36
In a posting to the kernel mailing list, Torvald, in his characteristic simple style, outlined why he prefers the GPLv2 - and also why he thinks the draft GPLv3 is in some ways a backward step.
Pointing out that the original Linux licence had said in effect "give all source back and never charge any money", Torvalds said he had switched the licence to GPLv2 because it was fair. "In other words, my original license (sic) very much had a 'fear and loathing' component to it. It was exactly that "never charge any money" part. But I realized (sic) that in the end, it was never really about the money, and that what I really looked for in a license was the "fairness" thing."
Think again. Most businesses only have PART of a DR plan - and this spells business disaster in the event of an IT disaster.
Download The Seven Sins of Disaster Recovery White Paper now and find out how you can prevent this happening to you.