Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

GNOME implodes - again Featured

From time to time, the GNOME Desktop Project blows up, with one developer or another indulging in soul-searching and realising that the project lacks direction. Or people. Or something else.

This should not come as a surprise to any GNU/Linux user; GNOME has been involved in this exercise for a long time and one should only worry when it does not happen.

This time, the recriminations come from Benjamin Otte, a developer who, after first describing the annual GNOME developer conference GUADEC as a "self-congratulating echo chamber" when announcing that he would not be attending, then went on to list a number of problems with the project.

His detailed post was titled "Staring into the abyss", which, in itself, gives an idea what it is all about. He mentioned a number of worrying things about GNOME - core developers are leaving, the project is understaffed, GNOME is a Red Hat project (meaning that it follows the company's dictates), the project has no goals, and it is losing both marketshare and mindshare.

There has been a lot of angst among GNOME users after the latest incarnation of the DE was released last year. The GNOME developers took a cautious approach, delaying the release by six months to ensure maximum stability. The example of KDE going live in 2008 with version 4.0 - a development version going by the lesser number - and suffering a lot of negative feedback was probably still fresh in the GNOME team's mind.

Unfortunately, what had been designed wasn't really good for PC users. It was a one-stop shop that resembled the interface of a mobile phone, similar to the Unity interface that Canonical, the company that produces the Ubuntu GNU/Linux distribution, has created.

Over time, there have been some tweaks to the GNOME 3 environment but users have not been happy. High-profile people like Linus Torvalds and Ted Ts'o have voiced their complaints in no uncertain terms. Many people have spoken publicly about migrating to other DEs like LXDE and XFCE.

In short, it hasn't been a good year for GNOME since version 3 hit the download servers.

GNOME has a reputation for not listening to its users, no matter who they are. According to Torvalds, the developers have their heads up their arses. That may sound harsh but then Torvalds is a man who does not dissemble - he is an engineer and tells it exactly like it is. Of course, he is not an expert in user interfaces but his complaints about GNOME 3 have been echoed in various degrees by users of varying levels of expertise.

Otte's claim that Red Hat is controlling GNOME does bear some examination, because the company's goals and those of GNOME - as stated - differ. Red Hat has no interest in the desktop; its income comes from Linux on the server. The company long ago made its strategy plain.

But GNOME has nothing but the personal desktop user as its target. If people stop using it as a personal DE, then it would be time for GNOME to shut shop.

And that is a worrying thought. If Red Hat is pulling in one direction, and GNOME in another, something has to give.

By contrast, KDE, the other big DE project for GNU/Linux users, is light years ahead. After the disaster of the 4.0 release, the KDE developers paid attention to users' plaints and fixed things. The DE is now very good though, like GNOME 3, it requires very robust hardware to work at speed.

KDE visionary Aaron Seigo is hard at work on a tablet interface which should be released sometime this year. GNOME has not made any moves in this direction.

When GNOME completed a decade of existence in 2007, , I posed the question: was such a project really needed? If the project continues the way Otte says it is going, then it may come to the point where the process of natural selection kicks in and only the fit survive.

FREE REPORT - IT MONITORING TOOLS COMPARISON

Are you looking to find the most efficient IT Monitoring tool available?

IT Monitoring is an essential part of the operations of any organisation with a significant network architecture.

Multiple IT monitoring platforms are available on the market today, supporting the various needs of small, medium-sized, and large enterprises, as well as managed service providers (MSPs).

This new report studies and compares eight different IT monitoring products in terms of functionality, operations, and usability on the same server platform with 100 end devices.

Which product is easiest to deploy, has the best maintenance mode capabilities, the best mobile access and custom reporting, dynamic thresholds setting, and enhanced discovery capabilities?

Download your free report to find out.

DOWNLOAD!

Sam Varghese

website statistics

A professional journalist with decades of experience, Sam for nine years used DOS and then Windows, which led him to start experimenting with GNU/Linux in 1998. Since then he has written widely about the use of both free and open source software, and the people behind the code. His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Connect