Warning this article may contain opinions of the author that you and iTWire don't agree with.
Visit the last page to have your say in our forum.

No. 1 Story

Telstra adds one million mobile services, but Sensis plummets

Telstra has revealed the addition of almost one million new mobile services in the six months to December 2011, but Sensis revenues plummeted 24 percent in 12 months.

read more

GNOME: 10 years old but did we need it?

Opinion and Analysis


It appears that even by 2001 a portion of the halo which had surrounded de Icaza when GNOME was set up had disappeared.

KDE had one disadvantage from the beginning - it was an European project. It had rather simple aims - to clone every function which was available to Windows users so Linux users would have all that functionality at their disposal. It has done much more than this and today is eminently more usable than GNOME. KDE never bothered much about marketing itself, the team simply produced software which was good.

GNOME was always viewed as an American initiative. There was more marketing, more buzz words (a trait that continues even today) and many structures of so-called leadership. Until at least release 2.0, GNOME was a clunky, heavy desktop, which was buggy in the extreme, Ximian was something of a nightmare; I personally had to reinstall Linux twice during the time when I was experimenting with it after Ximian installs went tits up.

Three years back, the oldest Linux distribution, Slackware, decided to drop GNOME altogether as it had become a "maintenance nightmare."

And no less a person than Linux Torvalds made his feelings about GNOME plain when he wrote in December 2005: "I personally just encourage people to switch to KDE. This "users are idiots, and are confused by functionality" mentality of Gnome is a disease. If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will use it. I don't use Gnome, because in striving to be simple, it has long since reached the point where it simply doesn't do what I need it to do. Please, just tell people to use KDE."

But visibility counts for more in today's world than substance.

GNOME has managed to remain in the limelight by tying itself to the Ubuntu project. Ubuntu is based on the unstable branch of Debian and one of its main selling points has been a timely release cycle; this ties in well with GNOME which is tied to a similar cycle. Never mind if the releases are buggy.

Ten years since its inception, GNOME still has lots of rough edges. One only has to place a number of files on the GNOME desktop to see what a mess appears - the sizes of the icons are all over the place. KDE displays icons of the same size. GNOME's default layout for its panels wastes tons of space... but let me stop there.

Hence, in the midst of the celebrations, it's good for the promoters of GNOME to stop and think what might have been if they had joined hands with KDE and moved forward in a cooperative manner. It is good to bear in mind that one of the men who started the project claiming that he wanted to provide "free software" is today tailgating APIs from Microsoft.


Loading comments ...



- sponsored feature -

The Death of Traditional BI: What’s Next?

How to Make Business Discovery Work for Your Business IP PABX BUYING GUIDE

Business Discovery takes its cues from consumer apps. Like Google, it encourages us- ers to hunt for and explore data without worrying about or even noticing the underly- ing technology. Their entire experience is working within an intuitive interface to get real-time, self-service results with only minimal training. ...more