Home opinion-and-analysis Fuzzy Logic Apple snaps at Samsung in UK legal judgement statement

Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

Apple Statement Apple Statement Credit - Apple.co.uk website
Get all your tech news delivered to your mail box five days a week
iTWire UPDATE - it's FREE!


After Apple lost its bid in the UK court system to have Samsung deemed a patent infringing copier, and ordered to post a statement on its UK site stating so, Apple has complied, while making its feelings, and contrary judgements in other jurisdictions, well known.

Apple has had a lot of success in playing legal games with Samsung, winning a range of judgements that state Samsung is infringing on Apple’s patents.

One jurisdiction Apple hasn’t succeeded in is the UK, where a judge famously stated Samsung’s products simply weren’t as “cool” as those of Apple’s.

In a link from its Apple.co.uk front page, Apple notes the judgement, on the 9th of July 2012, that ruled the “Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001”, while linking to a copy of the full judgement.

Apple pulls no punches, however, when it then quotes the judge’s statements concerning Apple’s and Samsung’s products:

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."

"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

Apple then goes on to note other details about the case, including the fact that “other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.”

So, you win some, you lose some, but with Samsung able to rapidly change its designs and three new challengers in Windows 8, Windows RT and Windows Phone 8, all of which Samsung is supporting in addition to its astounding array of Android-based efforts, Apple’s wins, while big in places like the US with over $1b awarded, aren’t slowing Samsung down too much.

The great tablet wars continue!

RECRUITMENT & RETENTION REPORT 2013

HIRE OR FIRE? BUY OR BUILD

2013 is well underway and Australian companies need to know whether they should invest in IT skills training or pay a premium for the people they need.

If you want to know which choices are being made in your sector, what skills are hard to find, which sectors intend to hire or fire and where the IT spend is going, this free report is must have.

GET YOUR REPORT NOW

Alex Zaharov-Reutt

joomla counter

One of Australia’s best-known technology journalists and consumer tech experts, Alex has appeared in his capacity as technology expert on all of Australia’s free-to-air and pay TV networks, including stints as presenter of Ch 10’s Internet Bright Ideas, Ch 7’s Room for Improvement and tech expert on Ch 9’s Today Show, among many other news and current affairs programs.

Connect

http://bs.serving-sys.com/BurstingPipe/adServer.bs?cn=tf&c=19&mc=imp&pli=5460041&PluID=0&ord=[2000]&rtu=-1