Stan Beer
Thursday, 01 June 2006 15:37
Opinion and Analysis
Search leader Google has reportedly told market analysts that the company is not interested in using its growing pile of cash to make acquisitions but would rather enter into partnerships with big name companies. In a conference call with Wall Street analysts on Wednesday, Google CEO Eric Schmidt also reportedly said that he prefers to build markets rather than buy into them.
Schmidt reportedly contends that mergers and acquisitions to buy
traffic is a bad business strategy and does not match Google's values
as a company. That's nice motherhood stuff but try telling Rupert
Murdoch that mergers and acquisitions in order to expand the company's
reach was a bad business strategy for News Corporation. He might
disagree.
It goes without saying that Google is a phenomenally successful
company. However, search and the advertising it generates is still the
only business that Google has built up to the point of domination. It's
true that search is a very lucrative game, as Google's fast growing
pile of cash demonstrates. However, despite releasing a bevy of web
services products and trying to move into the content space, Google has
not yet made a serious impression in any market other than search.
While talk abounds of possible mergers involving various subsets of
Microsoft, Yahoo and eBay, Google has remained aloof, maintaining a go
it alone stance. Perhaps the Google brains trust believes the company's
near 50% share of the search market makes it invulnerable to even the
combined forces of major online competitors. If so, then it may be
suffering from a bout of over confidence.
When one thinks of news, finance and other online content, one thinks
of Yahoo. When one thinks of instant messaging, it's Microsoft, AOL and
Yahoo. Google also lags way behind Microsoft and Yahoo in web email.
When one thinks of online retailing and auctions, one thinks of eBay.
Music downloads? iTunes. Books? Amazon. Those are a lot of markets that
Google doesn't own or, in some cases, even play in yet. And the
competitors are formidable and very innovative online companies
themselves.
It would be hard to believe, however, that Google does not take
competitors like Microsoft seriously. While Schmidt dismisses the
desktop as less relevant in the age of search advertising, his words
are belied by Google's actions with Dell last week. There's no doubt
that Google thinks that the desktop is extremely relevant if it is
prepared to spend a purported US$1 billion to be on Dell's desktops for
the next three years. And, despite Dell's strong position in the PC
space, the vast majority of desktops are not Dell.
Creating a new market through innovation is something few companies
ever achieve. Google is one of them. Although it's possible to repeat
its phenomenal success with search in other markets, the odds are
against it. Where the internet is concerned, there are a lot of
innovative companies. Google bought one not too long ago called
Writely, which has developed a web-based wordprocessor. With its
growing bank account of billions, it's a fair bet that Google would not
be averse to a few more strategic acquisitions.