Stan Beer
Tuesday, 13 January 2009 14:44
Opinion and Analysis
Page 1 of 3
Listening to Intel CEO boss Craig Barrett and Ericsson's chief technology officer Hakan Eriksson last week, one could be forgiven for thinking we were witnessing a rerun of the HD DVD versus Blu-ray war in the mobile broadband space. However, neither believes that will be the case - albeit for different reasons.
As far as Intel’s Barrett is concerned, WiMAX is
here to stay because of its first mover advantage in the market while
LTE is still "two years away". On the other hand, Ericsson’s Eriksson
is adamant that there is an inevitability that carriers will upgrade to
LTE from their existing, less advanced 3G technologies, as the upgrade
path is clearer and more seamless.
Addressing a gathering of analysts at Ericsson's LTE centre of
excellence in Melbourne Australia, Eriksson explained the benefits of
carriers and countries choosing LTE over WiMAX along the following
lines:
He said that China needed a "face saving" upgrade path from its
home-grown 3G technology, TD-SCDMA, to a next gen technology, and had
decided on LTE over WiMAX.
A country like China with its massive population and manufacturing base
already makes a huge impact on LTE and the ongoing development of LTE
technology for the rest of the world – an advantage that could have
been WiMAX’s, had Intel managed to convince China to go with WiMAX
instead of LTE.
Given LTE is a standard the telco operators demanded from the equipment
manufacturers, rather than the other way around of equipment
manufacturers delivering a standard to telcos (as was the case with
3G), it makes sense that more telcos are interested in LTE than WiMAX.
In addition, LTE doesn’t mean the immediate dismantling of HSPA
networks. Just as GSM networks are still in widespread use today, LTE
technology will be supplemented by existing HSPA, HSDPA, WCDMA and GSM
networks around the world.
CONTINUED Page 2