Stan Beer
Thursday, 13 March 2008 12:27
Opinion and Analysis
Page 1 of 2
Intel has announced its intention to enter the high capacity solid state storage market with a 160GB solid state drive (SSD) in the next three months. Is this the beginning of the end for the hard disk?
Since the invention of non-volatile Flash RAM
more than two decades ago, technology market watchers have been
watching and waiting to see signs of a weakening of the market for what
appears to be an obsolete technology, magnet storage. Yet it hasn't
happened and the market for hard drives appears healthier than ever.
In the words of the iconical wiry haired scientist: why is this so?
Logically, SSD storage should be the way to go - no moving parts to
wear out, lighter, smaller, much faster access times, lower power
consumption, more releiable and less susceptibility to the bumps and
bruises of travelling.
The problem for the SSD crowd, however, is that the mag drive folks are
always two steps ahead of the game. They just keep managing to put
ridiculously large amounts of storage on ever smaller disks for a
comparatively tiny cost. Want 500GB disk storage internal or external?
No problem, it'll set you back a bit more than $100 from suppliers like
Western Digital, Hitachi or Seagate. Want 128GB SSD - the most silicon
storage you can get these days - fine, be prepared to pay $1500 or more
(apologies if I've under or overstated the prices but you get the idea).
The fact is SSD is still way too expensive for the average computer
user and, although prices are expected to drop dramatically over the
next three years, the mag disk folks keep putting more storage on those
platters for dirt cheap prices. CONTINUED