Stan Beer
Sunday, 09 December 2007 06:58
Opinion and Analysis
Page 2 of 2
However, it is not just the possibility of making contact with an
unknown cyber undesirable that presents a danger to the more vulnerable
and socially naive young people. Unfortunately, a more immediate and
less controllable threat can come from known members of a peer group.
It's all very well for ads on US TV to warn young
people of the dangers of posting images and information about
themselves online. But how do you protect yourself against people you
know posting images they have of you or nasty stories about you on
their social networking page and distributing the material to their
network of friends? What do you do when a jilted boyfriend or
girlfriend starts a hate web page devoted to you?
The problem with Web posting and subsequent viral distribution is that
often what's done cannot be undone. AOL may well rue the day when it
published a huge slice of its search queries to a public Web page but
not as much as the thousands of members whose identities had been
compromised. By the time AOL realized its error and removed the page
from the Web, the list of queries, which could be grouped together by
AOL member number, had been copied and circulated around the Web via a
number of forums.
Many adults find it upsetting to be the victim of flame attacks on the
Web. However, for children in their teenage years, a key formative
period of their lives when they are already subject to mixed feelings,
emotions and uncertainties, having their vulnerabilities laid bare and
preyed upon in a public forum on the Web can be devastating, sometimes
even deadly. For parents of such children, there is often a sense of
powerlessness, because these are the years when their children tend to
clam up and keep secrets from their elders.
While teenage children struggle with finding and establishing their
identity online, pre-teens are already serving their apprenticeships on
games oriented social networks like Club Penguin, Runescape and World
of Warcraft. They're already starting to communicate with each other
via email and IM systems and becoming online savvy. These are the next
round of MySpace and Facebook users.
Returning to the opening question of this article, forbidding teenage
children from doing anything that's legal without having a pretty
damned good reason is simply asking for trouble. If our kids are in a
community where most of their friends and peers communicate via one of
the popular social networks, ordering them not to take part in such
online activities is not realistic and, in many cases, will simply
cause them to go behind our backs.
A far better approach is to accept the fact that our children are part
of the Web 2.0 generation and therefore will want to take advantage of
the full richness of communications experiences that social networking
sites provide. Our task therefore is to monitor their activities as
best we can but, above all, help equip them to the best of our
abilities with the necessary knowledge and education that they need to
make their online experience a safe and enjoyable one. Sooner or later,
we have to allow our children to ride the train alone but we should
never turn them loose without a route map and time-table.