Stan Beer
Tuesday, 20 November 2007 04:26
Opinion and Analysis
As my colleague Sam Varghese has written , after nearly two weeks of flawless operation, my first Ubuntu Linux installation unexpectedly became unstable, crashed and was unable to be booted. Puzzled that an OS with the reputed stability of Ubuntu could behave like this, I searched forums and user groups for an explanation. What I found led me to believe that an open source package manager called Automatix that I installed was the cause. As a result, I am going to try an experiment: same computer, two disks, two clean installs, two operating systems - Vista and Ubuntu. But is there an issue with Linux and video codecs?
Today I will pick up my formerly partitioned
Ubuntu and Windows Home Server box from my system builder. The computer
has had an extra drive added so that I can run Vista on one 320GB disk
and Ubuntu on the other 250GB drive.
I have a boxed review copy of Vista Ultimate courtesy of the original
Microsoft launch which I am using to replace Windows Home Server. My
reason for switching Windows operating systems on this box are two
fold. One, I want to give Vista a fair trial on a highly configured
computer from a long standing Windows user's perspective. Microsoft has
always claimed that Vista works well on a computer with plenty of
memory, processor power and a good graphics card. Two, the brand new
review copy of the McAfee Total Protection security package I was sent
from that vendor doesn't work with Windows Home Server!
With regard to my recent experience with Ubuntu, I have deliberately
held back on writing anything until I tracked down the cause of the
crash. The Debian based distros, such as Ubuntu, have a track record or
remarkable stability so I was surprised - no astounded - that my
computer went down within two weeks. I had previously installed an
earlier version of Ubuntu, Dapper Drake, on a test machine that was
left running continuously for two months.
The reason I downloaded Automatix was that I was becoming frustrated in
my efforts to find a way to run a standard off-the-shelf DVD movie
using either of the two most popular Ubuntu players, MPlayer and Totem.
Perusing the Ubuntu Forums led me to a post that recommended Automatix
so I gave it a try.
There are two things that now worry me about Automatix and Ubuntu. One
is that Ubuntu itself provides no warning that Automatix may be a
package that could introduce instabilities - despite the fact that the
Ubuntu Technical Board actually had a tester turn in a highly
negative report on the package highlighting this issue.
More importantly, however, it's hard to believe that a distro as mature
as Gutsy Gibbon doesn't provide out of the box DVD play back. I'm
not entirely across the legalities of this but, as near as I can
understand it, Ubuntu requires users to search its package repositories
using the Synaptic package manager to enable the necessary codecs to
play back encrypted DVD movies. The reason I'm told is that because it
is actually illegal in some countries to download the codecs.
As I said, I'm not sure why this should be the case or even if it is.
However, if Ubuntu (and presumably all Linux users) have to break laws
- whether they agree with them or not - in order to play DVD movies,
then this a real problem that needs to be addressed.
I would be interested to hear about this from knowledgeable members of
the Linux community because tomorrow I'm reloading Ubuntu - actually
Kubuntu because I would like to try the KDE version.