Stan Beer
Wednesday, 17 October 2007 06:51
Opinion and Analysis
When Universal Music Group announced in August that it would be offering DRM-free music downloads in the US for 99c at competitor sites to iTunes eyebrows shot up. Apple had already done a deal with EMI to offer DRM-free music on iTunes for $1.29. Could Apple simply ignore the Universal move because of the iTunes market dominance? We now have our answer. Are we seeing the first chinks in the iTunes armour?
Apple has now dropped the price of its DRM-free
music to 99c, the same price as its lower quality and restricted
Fairplay DRM music. This could present a problem for Apple because most
iTunes users would choose to download higher quality unrestricted music
if given a choice. However, to date the only DRM-free music available
on iTunes is from the smallest of the four major recording companies
EMI and some independent labels.
So what's the problem? The problem is that a significantly wider choice
of DRM-free music is available from the world's largest recording
company at sites other than iTunes, such as Amazon, Rhapsody, Wal-Mart
and Best Buy. Because this non-iTunes music is DRM-free there should be
no problem getting it on to iPods.
Right now Universal is only running a five month trial of its DRM-free
service and sceptics doubt that it will have any long term impact on
sales through the iTunes juggernaut. Yet Apple has responded like a
company which is at least concerned if not worried.
For Universal, which has been watching Apple like hawk, the latest move
by iTunes must be encouraging. Universal boss Doug Morris has
implemented a multi-pronged anti-iTunes strategy and is said to be
holding talks with both Sony BMG and Warner Bros on bundling music with
non-iPod portable music players.
The immense popularity of the iPod is likely to see it unaffected by
any such bundling deals. However, if these three major players ever
decided to get together on offering DRM-free music through sites other
than iTunes, a serious challenge to the dominance of iTunes could
eventuate.
If such a thing does eventuate, those who hate the record companies
could hardly complain. After all, nearly every buyer would like to see
the demise DRM music, including the Apple faithful, wouldn't they?