Stan Beer
Sunday, 15 April 2007 20:06
Opinion and Analysis
The news that iPods equipped with Wi-Fi are imminent has raised speculation about how Apple intends to make use of the new wireless capabilities of its fastest selling device. Some commentators believe that wireless data transfer is the most probable use. However, this seems unlikely given previous comments from Apple. Music sharing - now that's another story.
During an interview with Apple's global iPod
product manager, Greg Joswiak, in January at Macworld, he revealed that
the Wi-Fi capable iPhone would not be used to transfer data wirelessly.
The iPhone will be required to sync with a Mac or PC in the same way
that iPods currently do. There is no reason to think that a Wi-Fi iPod
would be given capabilities beyond those of the iPhone.
However, when asked if the iPhone will be able to "squirt" music to
other iPods, Joswiak was less direct and more coy. He made a joke about
the Microsoft term and avoided giving a direct answer.
In fact, the concept of sharing music wirelessly with friends,
introduced by Microsoft for its currently unsuccessful Zune player,
actually makes much more sense for the dominant iPod, which is selling
at a rate of nearly 10 million units a quarter, than Zune or any other
player.
Peer groups of iPod users are quite common. The same cannot be said of
any other portable music player. For that reason alone, Apple has a
brilliant opportunity to literally create an elite wireless network of
music sharing users that requires an iPod for admission.
Microsoft, SanDisk and the other music player vendors will only be able
to look on with envy while groups of young people with colorful Wi-Fi
enabled iPods share music wirelessly in public places. The problem for
Apple's competitors is no longer a technical one. With more than 100
million iPods sold and by far the most popular online music store,
Apple has already won the cultural battle.