Davey Winder
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 03:34
IT Policy -
Regulation
Some 95 percent of all UK ISPs filter known child abuse sites, yet that leaves a huge number still able to access some horrific images.
The Children's Charities' Coalition on Internet Safety represents the
likes of Barnado's, the Children's Society and NSPCC as well as working
with the European NGO Alliance for Child Safety Online.
CHIS has an aim to make the Internet, along
with the wider digital world, a safer place for children and young
people. As such it has issued a
press release which at once talks of delight and horror
at how far the UK Government has come in this regard.
Referring to a policy commitment from three years ago in relation to
online childe abuse images, CHIS expresses regret and concern at the
failure of Government to fulfill that commitment.
Back in April 2006 the UK Government stated that it would like all Brit
ISPs voluntarily deploy a blacklist of known child abuse sites as
provided by the Internet Watch Foundation, and so in effect block
access to those sites.
On many occasions since then a deadline of 31st December 2007 was put
upon making this happen. Importantly, it has also stated that unless
100 percent compliance was achieved it would consider 'alternative
means' of achieving an access ban.
The more astute amongst you may have noticed that we have long since
passed this date, so how close has the UK come to meeting the target?
CHIS notes that the Government has confirmed 95 percent compliance
amongst UK ISPs but warns that while this sound impressive, that 5
percent shortfall means that
some "three-quarters of a million households can still gain access to these horrific illegal sites."
While CHIS argues this "represents a serious failure of the UK’s
self-regulatory system and of the Government to exert itself" I wonder
if this kind of blacklist compliance is actually the right approach in
the first place?
After all, it is only a couple of months since
access to Wikipedia was
blocked because the IWF
blacklist kicked in when a 1976 album cover by a German rock band was
deemed to be 'potentially illegal.'