Davey Winder
Friday, 22 August 2008 01:22
IT Policy -
Regulation
Page 2 of 2
Judge Jeremy Fogel
ruled that even
if Universal was correct in suggesting that fair use only excuses
infringement "the fact remains that fair use is a lawful use of a
copyright."
The DMCA has a clause which allows for those who
have been on the wrong end of a bad takedown notice to seek damages.
Importantly, the judge ruled that if a copyright owner is accused of
acting in bad faith by issuing a notice without proper consideration of
fair use is "sufficient to state a misrepresentation claim."
Universal seemed content to argue that it would, as a copyright owner,
not be able to act rapidly enough against potential infringements if it
had to evaluate fair use before issuing a takedown notice.
Which rather stinks of shooting first and asking questions later, it seems to me.
Luckily, Judge Fogel is that rare breed: a judge who seems to
understand modern technology. He denied the motion from Universal to
dismiss the damages claim from Stephanie Lenz.