James Riley
Wednesday, 25 November 2009 09:25
IT Policy -
Government Tech Policy
Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner has dealt the Federal Government out of all commercial investment decisions made by the $85.6 billion Future Fund as a result of a $2.4 billion sell-down of Telstra shares last August that caused protests from shareholder groups.
And he made clear Government would stay out of any Future Fund board
decision related to its Telstra shareholding and any company vote that
might occur regarding its possible structural separation.
The Future Fund remains Telstra's largest shareholder with about 10 per cent of its equity.
The Future Fund, chaired former Commonwealth Bank boss David Murray,
sold a huge tranche of Telstra shares just weeks before
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy unveiled regulatory reforms
that, among other things, sought the separation of Telstra's wholesale
and retail businesses.
Shareholders cried foul, the suggestion being that the Commonwealth
Future Fund must have been given an inside run on the details of
Government plans.
Mr Tanner used a National Press Club address in Canberra to formally
excise Government input into any and all commercial investment
decisions related to money held by the fund.
The complication was an unforeseen consequence of the Howard Government
decision to transfer the 17 per cent of Telstra shares still held by
the Federal Government into the fund.
The previous Government issued a
Ministerial Direction dictating that the shares be held in escrow until
November 2008 (Government had been concerned that potential investors
would be scared off by concern that the Commonwealth could flood the
market with shares, driving down the price)
Subsequently, the Future Fund made its first big sell down in August
this year, creating a moment of considerable awkwardness at a pivotal
moment in Telstra's shareprice history – awkward for the Government,
for the Future Fund, for Telstra and its shareholders.
"The Australian Government had no involvement in this (Future Fund)
decision," Mr Tanner said. "Nor did the Future Fund have any prior
access to or knowledge of Government plans in relation to Telstra or
the national broadband network."
"The Government's negotiations with Telstra on structural separation
mean that the Future Fund's activities must be absolutely independent
of the Government."
"The existence of a power of ministerial direction regarding the Future
Fund's Telstra shares casts doubt over this independence."
Mr Tanner said the importance of the Future Fund's operational
independence was crucial in the context of the Government negotiations
with Telstra over its regulatory and broadband issues.
"I want to make it absolutely clear that the Government will not be
directing the Board in relation to its Telstra shareholdings as is
allowed under the Future Fund Act, including the exercising of its
voting rights in relation to any shareholder vote on structural
separation," Mr Tanner said.
"Nor will the Government discuss with the Board its intentions in
relation to the use of its voting rights. The Future Fund will make its
decisions with only one issue in mind: shareholder value."