James Riley
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 11:59
IT Industry -
Strategy
The Australian Bankers Association has rejected calls for bank customers to be given an explicit choice about whether personal information is processed offshore or in Australia, and said its members were already required get consent from customers about the handling of data when they signed up for services.
Requiring more explicit permission on where data can be processed by
banks and other financial institutions was impractical, and would
inevitably lead to higher costs, ABA chief executive David Bell said.
South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon called for greater transparency
from banks about where personal information was sent for processing,
joining with the Finance Sector Union in calling for customers to be
given a choice to have that data retained on-shore.
"Confidentiality of customer information is at the core of a successful banking operation," Bell said.
"The ABA is confident that banks take appropriate measures to protect
customer information, regardless of whether or not some processing
functions are undertaken offshore or whether they are all done in
Australia."
He said customers already provide consent on how their personal data
can be disclosed by a bank, which was a requirement under existing law.
The FSU said yesterday more than 5,500 jobs in the finance sector had
been moved to lower-cost offshore locations – a number the ABA dispute.
Bell maintains the numbers of jobs in the sector had increased in 2008
– as measured by the Australian Bureau of Statistics – by 1.6 per cent
to 146,700 last year, despite the effects to the global economic
downturn.
"It is up to individual banks as to how they manage their systems and
data, but it is important to recognise that banks not only have a legal
obligation to secure personal information that they collect from their
customers but that they also have a very strong commercial incentive to
ensure customer information is properly protected." Bell said.
The union and Senators demand that customers provide written permission
before information is sent overseas is impractical and unnecessary, he
said.