Beverley Head
Wednesday, 14 October 2009 06:14
A report in the Australian Financial Review earlier this week explored software house Atlassian’s disenchantment with traditional recruiters. The report quoted co-founder Mike Cannon Brookes saying that; “The problem with recruitment companies is that 80 % of them are pathetic. Ten % are really good, but the others ruin the industry for everyone.”
The report went on to explain how Atlassian had set new rules of engagement with recruitment companies, and could, as Google has, eventually do away entirely with using recruiters.
Keeping a much tighter rein on talent makes sense according to Gauvin, especially for new economy industries where an increasing proportion of assets were based on intangible human capital.
“The market capitalisation of companies like Google is in talent. Probably only 2 % of their assets are tangible,” he said.
Yet to date he claimed that few employers invested much in the IT systems to manage that talent. Gauvin pointed to recent US research, which he suspected was also valid for Australia, which showed that while enterprises spent $12,000 per employee per year on their ERP systems, they spent just $10 per employee per year on talent management systems.
“There is a shift that needs to happen if companies need to improve the way that talent is being managed,” said Gauvin.
Naturally enough he’s hoping that organisations will look to Taleo’s business or enterprise scale solutions to plug the gap. Sold only on a Software as a Service basis small and medium enterprises could expect an entry level price of $3,000-4,000 a year for one user, he said, with enterprise level costing kicking in at around $30,000-40,000 a year.
Think again. Most businesses only have PART of a DR plan - and this spells business disaster in the event of an IT disaster.
Download The Seven Sins of Disaster Recovery White Paper now and find out how you can prevent this happening to you.